Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

AI Revolution (2024)

Curious minds want to know... Documentary Movie collection.

Moderators: Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters, Maskath3, GabrielAlejo2341, sidolanters

Watch Docus Amazon   Docus Merchandise

Documentary movie collection.

AI Revolution (2024)

Post by bunniefuu »

"Viewers like you make

this program possible".

"Support your local PBS station".



MILES O'BRIEN:

Machines that think like humans.

Our dream to create machines

in our own image

that are smart and intelligent

goes back to antiquity.

Well, can it bring it to me?

O'BRIEN:

Is it possible that the dream

of artificial intelligence

has become reality?

They're able to do things

that we didn't

think they could do.

MANOLIS KELLIS:

Go was thought to be a game

where machines would never win.

The number of choices

for every move is enormous.

O'BRIEN:

And now, the possibilities

seem endless.

MUSTAFA SULEYMAN:

And this is going to be

one of the greatest boosts

to productivity in the history

of our species.

That looks like just a hint

of some type of smoke.

O'BRIEN:

Identifying problems

before a human can...

LECIA SEQUIST:

We taught the model to recognize

developing lung cancer.

O'BRIEN:

and inventing new drugs.

PETRINA KAMYA:

I never thought

that we would be able

to be doing the things

we're doing with A.I..

O'BRIEN:

But along with the hope...

[imitating Obama]:

This is a dangerous time.

O'BRIEN:

comes deep concern.

One of the first drops

in the feared flood

of A.I.-created disinformation.

We have lowered barriers

to entry to manipulate reality.

We're going to live in a world

where we don't know what's real.

The risks are uncertain

and potentially enormous.

O'BRIEN:

How powerful is A.I.?

How does it work?

And how can we reap

its extraordinary benefits...

Sybil looked here,

and anticipated

that there would be a problem.

O'BRIEN:

without jeopardizing

our future?

"A.I. Revolution"

right now, on "NOVA!"

[whirring]



Tell me the backstory

on inflection A.I..

[voiceover]:

Our story begins

with the making of this story.

PI [on computer]:

The story of Inflection A.I.

is an exciting one.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

I was researching

an interview subject.

Who is Mustafa Suleyman?

[voiceover]:

Something I've done

a thousand times

in my 40-year career.

PI [on computer]:

Mustafa Suleyman is a

true pioneer

in the field

of artificial intelligence.

[voiceover]:

But this time, it was different:

I wasn't typing out

search terms.

What is machine learning?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

I was having a conversation

with a computer.

PI:

Sounds like an

exciting project, Miles.

[voiceover]:

It felt like something

big had changed.

PI:

Machine learning, ML, is a type

of artificial intelligence.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And as it happened,

I was focused on one of the

innovators of this revolution.

Okay, so if I do this...

[voiceover]:

Mustafa Suleyman is co-founder

of a startup called Inflection.

It makes an artificial

intelligence assistant

called Pi.

So now you can speak...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

I met them both in London.

It's fundamentally

different, isn't it?

Yeah,

it's a conversational style.

All of us humans

learn through stories,

and through narrative, and

through interactive dialogue.

And now, the machine can

kind of come alive,

and talk to you

about whatever it is

that's on top of your mind.

O'BRIEN:

Tell me about the PBS program

"NOVA."

[voiceover]:

Chatbots can offer up

quick answers, write poems,

finish essays,

and translate languages

among many other things.

PI [over phone]:

"NOVA" is a science

documentary series...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

They aren't perfect,

but they have put artificial

intelligence in our hands,

and into

the public consciousness.

And it seems

we're equal parts leery

and intrigued.

SULEYMAN:

A.I. is a tool

for helping us to understand

the world around us,

predict what's likely to happen,

and then invent

solutions that help improve

the world around us.

My motivation was to try

to use A.I. tools

to, uh, you know,

invent the future.

The rise

in artificial intelligence...

REPORTER:

A.I. technology is developing...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Lately, it seems a dark future

is already here...

The technology could replace

millions of jobs...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

if you listen

to the news reporting.

The moment civilization

was transformed.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

So how can

artificial intelligence help us,

and how might it hurt us?

At the center of

the public handwringing:

how should we put

guardrails around it?

We definitely need

more regulations in place...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Artificial intelligence

is moving fast

and changing the world.

Can we keep up?

Non-human minds

smarter than our own.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The news coverage may make it

seem like

artificial intelligence

is something new.

At a moment of revolution...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But human beings have been

thinking about this

for a very long time.

I have a very fine brain.

Our dream to create machines

in our own image

that are smart and intelligent

goes back to antiquity.

Uh, it's,

it's something that has,

has permeated the evolution

of society and of science.

[mortars firing]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The modern origins

of artificial intelligence

can be traced

back to World w*r II,

and the prodigious

human brain of Alan Turing.

The legendary

British mathematician

developed a machine

capable of deciphering

coded messages from the Nazis.

After the w*r, he was among

the first to predict computers

might one day match

the human brain.

There are no surviving

recordings of Turing's voice,

but in 1951, he gave

a short lecture on BBC radio.

We asked an A.I.-generated voice

to read a passage.

TURING A.I. VOICE:

I think it is probable,

for instance,

that at the end of the century,

it will be possible

to program a machine

to answer questions

in such a way

that it will be extremely

difficult to guess

whether the answers are being

given by a man

or by the machine.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And so,

the Turing test was born.

Could anyone build a machine

that could converse

with a human in a way

that is indistinguishable

from another person?

In 1956,

a group of pioneering scientists

spent the summer

brainstorming

at Dartmouth College.

And they told the world that

they have coined

a new academic field of study.

They called it

artificial intelligence

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

For decades,

their aspirations remained

far ahead of

the capabilities of computers.

In 1978,

"NOVA" released its first film

on artificial intelligence.

We have seen the first

crude beginnings

of artificial intelligence...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And the legendary science

fiction writer,

Arthur C. Clark was,

as always, prescient.

It doesn't really exist yet at

any level,

because our most complex

computers are still morons,

high-speed morons,

but still morons.

Nevertheless, we have

the possibility of machines

which can outpace their

creators,

and therefore,

become more intelligent than us.

At the time, researchers were

developing "expert systems,"

purpose-built

to perform specific tasks.

So the thing that we need to do

to make machine understand, um,

you know, our world,

is to put all our knowledge

into a machine

and then provide it

with some rules.



O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Classic A.I. reached a pivotal

moment in 1997

when an artificial intelligence

program devised by IBM,

called "Deep Blue" defeated

world chess champion

and grandmaster Garry Kasparov.

It searched about 200 million

positions a second,

navigating through

a tree of possibilities

to determine the best move.

RUS:

The program analyzed

the board configuration,

could project forward

millions of moves

to examine millions of

possibilities,

and then picked the best path.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Effective, but brittle,

Deep Blue wasn't

strategizing as a human does.

From the outset, artificial

intelligence researchers

imagined making machines

that think like us.

The human brain, with

more than 80 billion neurons,

learns not by following rules,

but rather by taking

in a steady stream of data,

and looking for patterns.

KELLIS:

The way that learning

actually works

in the human brain is by

updating the weights

of the synaptic connections

that are underlying this

neural network.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Manolis Kellis is a

Professor of Computer Science

at the Massachusetts Institute

of Technology.

So we have trillions

of parameters in our brain

that we can adjust

based on experience.

I'm getting a reward.

I will update

the strength of the connections

that led to this reward...

I'm getting punished,

I will diminish the strength

of the connections

that led to the punishment.

So this is

the original neural network.

We did not invent it,

we, you know, we inherited it.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But could an artificial

neural network

be made in our own image?

Turing imagined it.

But computers were nowhere near

powerful enough to do it

until recently.

It's only with the advent

of extraordinary data sets

that we have, uh,

since the early 2000s,

that we were able to build up

enough images,

enough annotations,

enough text to be able

to finally train

these sufficiently powerful

models.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

An artificial neural network is,

in fact,

modeled on the human brain.

It uses interconnected nodes,

or neurons,

that communicate with

each other.

Each node receives

inputs from other nodes

and processes those inputs

to produce outputs,

which are then passed on to

still other nodes.

It learns by adjusting

the strength of the connections

between the nodes based on

the data it is exposed to.

This process

of adjusting the connections

is called training,

and it allows an

artificial neural network

to recognize patterns

and learn from its experiences

like humans do.

A child,

how is it learning so fast?

It is learning so fast

because it's constantly

predicting the future

and then seeing what happens

and updating their weights in

their neural network

based on what just happened.

Now you can take this

self-supervised learning

paradigm

and apply it to machines.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

At first, some of these

artificial neural networks

were trained on vintage

Atari video games

like "Space Invaders"

and "Breakout."

Games reduce the complexity

of the real world

to a very narrow set

of actions that can be taken.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Before he started Inflection,

Mustafa Suleyman co-founded

a company called

DeepMind in 2010.

It was acquired by Google

four years later.

When an A.I. plays a game,

we show it frame-by-frame,

every pixel

in the moving image.

And so the A.I. learns

to associate pixels

with actions that it can take

moving left or right

or pressing the fire button.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

When it obliterates blocks

or shoots aliens,

the connections between the

nodes that enabled that success

are strengthened.

In other words, it is rewarded.

When it fails, no reward.

Eventually,

all those reinforced connections

overrule the weaker ones.

The program has learned

how to win.

This sort of repeated allocation

of reward

for repetitive behavior

is a great way to train a dog.

It's a great way to teach a kid.

It's a great way for us

as adults to adapt our behavior.

And in fact,

it's actually a good way

to train machine learning

algorithms to get better.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

In 2014, DeepMind began work

on an artificial neural network

called "AlphaGo"

that could play the ancient,

and deceptively complex,

board game of Go.

KELLIS:

Go was thought to be a game

where machines would never win.

The number of choices

for every move is enormous.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But at DeepMind,

they were counting on

the astounding growth

of compute power.

And I think that's the key

concept to try to grasp,

is that we are massively,

exponentially growing

the amount of computation used,

and in some sense,

that computation is a proxy

for how intelligent

the model is.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

AlphaGo was trained two ways.

First, it was fed a large

data set of expert Go games

so that it could

learn how to play the game.

This is known

as supervised learning.

Then the software played against

itself many millions of times,

so-called

reinforcement learning.

This gradually improved

its skills and strategies.

In March 2016,

AlphaGo faced Lee Sedol,

one of the world's

top-ranking players

in a five-game match in

Seoul, South Korea.

AlphaGo not only won,

but also made a move so novel,

the Go cognoscenti

thought it was a huge blunder.

That's a very surprising move.

There's no question to me

that these A.I. models

are creative.

They're incredibly creative.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It turns out the move

was a stroke of brilliance.

And this

emergent creative behavior

was a hint of what was to come:

generative A.I.

Meanwhile,

a company called OpenA.I.

was creating

a generative A.I. model

that would become ChatGPT.

It allows users

to engage in a dialogue

with a machine

that seems uncannily human.

It was first released in 2018,

but it was a subsequent version

that became a global sensation

in late 2022.

This promises to be

the viral sensation

that could completely reset

how we do things.

Cranking out entire essays

in a matter of seconds.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Not only did it wow the public,

it also caught

artificial intelligence

innovators off guard.

YOSHUA BENGIO:

It surprised me a lot

that they're able

to do things that

we didn't think they could do

simply by

learning to imitate

how humans respond.

And I thought this

kind of abilities would take

many more years or decades.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

ChatGPT is

a large language model.

LLMs start by consuming massive

amounts of text:

books, articles and websites,

which are publicly available on

the internet.

By recognizing patterns

in billions of words,

they can make guesses

at the next word in a sentence.

That's how ChatGPgenerates unique answers

to your questions.

If I ask for a haiku

about the blue sky

it writes something

that seems completely original.

KELLIS:

If you're good at predicting

this next word,

it means you're understanding

something about the sentence.

What the style

of the sentence is,

what the feeling

of the sentence is.

And you can't tell whether

this was a human or a machine.

That's basically the definition

of the Turing test.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

So, how is this changing

our world?

Well, It might change my world...

As an arm amputee.

Ready for my casting call, right?

MONROE [chuckling]:

Yes.

Let's do it. All right.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

That's Brian Monroe of

the Hanger Clinic.

He's been my prosthetist

since an injury

took my arm above the elbow

ten years ago.

So what we're going to do today

is take a mold of your arm.Uh-huh.

Kind of is like

a cast for a broken bone.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Up until now, I have used

a body-powered prosthetic.

Harness and a cable allow me

to move it

by shrugging my shoulders.

The technology is

more than a century old.

But artificial intelligence,

coupled with small

electric motors,

is finally pushing prosthetics

into the 21st century.

Which brings me to Chicago

and the offices of

a small company called Coapt.

I met the C.E.O., Blair Locke,

a pioneer in the push

to apply artificial intelligence

to artificial limbs.

So, what do we have here?

What are we going to do?

This allows us to very easily

test how your control would be

using a pretty simple cuff;

this has electrodes in it,

and we'll let the power

of the electronics

that are doing

the machine learning

see what you're capable

of. All right, let's give it a try.

[voiceover]:

Like most amputees,

I feel my missing hand almost

as if it was still there...

A phantom.

Everything will touch.

Is that okay?

Yeah. Not too tight?

No. All good.Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It's almost entirely immobile,

stuck in molasses.

Make a fist, not too hard.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But I am able to imagine

moving it ever so slightly.

And I'm gonna have you squeeze

into that a little bit harder.

Very good, and I see the

pattern on the screen

change a little bit.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And when I do,

I generate an array of faint

electrical signals in my stump.

That's your muscle information.

It feels,

it feels like I'm overcoming

something that's really stuck.

I don't know,

is that enough signal?

Should be.

Oh, okay.

We don't need a lot of signal,

we're going for information

in the signal,

not how loud it is.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And this is where artificial

intelligence comes in.

Using a virtual

prosthetic depicted on a screen,

I trained a machine learning

algorithm to become fluent

in the language

of my nerves and muscles.

We see eight different signals

on the screen.

All eight of those sensor sites

are going to feed in together

and let the algorithm

sort out the data.

What you are experiencing

is your ability

to teach the system

what is hand-closed to you.

And that's different

than what it would be to me.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

I told the software

what motion I desired,

open, close, or rotate,

then imagined moving

my phantom limb accordingly.

This generates an array

of electromyographic,

or EMG, signals in

my remaining muscles.

I was training the A.I.

to connect the pattern

of these electrical signals

with a specific movement.

LOCK:

The system adapts,

and as you add more data

and use it over time,

it becomes more robust,

and it learns

to improve upon use.

O'BRIEN:

Is it me that's learning, or

the algorithm that's learning?

Or are we learning together? LOCK:

You're learning together.

Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

So, how does the Coapt pattern

recognition system work?

It's called a Bayesian

classification model.

As I train the software,

it labels my

various EMG patterns

into corresponding

classes of movement...

Hand open, hand closed,

wrist rotation, for example.

As I use the arm,

it compares the electrical

signals I'm transmitting

to the existing library

of classifications I taught it.

It relies on

statistical probability

to choose the best match.

And this is just one way

machine learning

is quietly

revolutionizing medicine.

Computer scientist

Regina Barzilay

first started working on

artificial intelligence

in the 1990s, just as

rule-based A.I. like Deep Blue

was giving way

to neural networks.

She used the techniques

to decipher dead languages.

You might call it

a small language model.

Something that is fun and

intellectually very challenging,

but it's not like

it's going to change our life.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And then her life changed

in an instant.

CONSTANCE LEHMAN:

We see a spot there.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

In 2014, she was diagnosed

with breast cancer.

BARZILAY [voiceover]:

When you go through the

treatment,

there are a lot of

people who are suffering.

I was interested in

what I can do about it, and

clearly it was not continuing

deciphering dead languages,

and it was quite a journey.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Not surprisingly, she began that

journey with mammograms.

LEHMAN:

It's a little bit

more prominent.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

She and Constance Lehman,

a radiologist at

Massachusetts General Hospital,

realized the Achilles heel

in the diagnostic system

is the human eye.

BARZILAY [voiceover]:

So the question that we ask is,

what is the likelihood

of these patients

to develop cancer

within the next five years?

We, with our human eyes,

cannot really make these

assertions

because the patterns

are so subtle.

LEHMAN: Now, is that different

from the surrounding tissue?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It's a perfect use case

for pattern recognition

using what is known as

a convolutional neural network.



Here's an example

of how CNNs get smart:

they comb through a picture with

many virtual magnifying glasses.

Each one is looking for

a specific kind of puzzle piece,

like an edge,

a shape, or a texture.

Then it makes

simplified versions,

repeating the process

on larger and larger sections.

Eventually

the puzzle can be assembled.

And it's time to make a guess.

Is it a cat? A dog? A tree?

Sometimes the guess is right,

but sometimes it's wrong.

And here's the learning part:

with a process

called backpropagation,

labeled images are sent back to

correct the previous operation.

So the next time

it plays the guessing game,

it will be even better.

To validate the model,

Regina and her team gathered up

more than 128,000 mammograms

collected at seven sites

in four countries.

More than 3,800 of them

led to a cancer diagnosis

within five years.

You just give to it the image,

and then

the five years of outcomes,

and it can learn the likelihood

of getting a cancer diagnosis.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The software, called Mirai,

was a success.

In fact, it is between

75% and 84% accurate

in predicting

future cancer diagnoses.

Then, a friend of

Regina's developed lung cancer.

SEQUIST:

In lung cancer, it's actually

sort of mind boggling

how much has changed.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Her friend saw oncologist

Lecia Sequist.

She and Regina wondered

if artificial intelligence

could be applied

to CAT scans of patients' lungs.

SEQUIST:

We taught the model

to recognize the patterns

of developing lung cancer

by using thousands of CAT scans

from patients who were

participating

in a clinical trial.

From the new study?

Oh, interesting.Correct.

SEQUIST [voiceover]:

We had a lot of information

about them.

We had demographic information,

we had health information,

and we had outcomes information.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

They call the model Sibyl.

In the retrospective study,

right,

so the retrospective data...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Radiologist Florian Fintelmann

showed me what it can do.

FINTELMANN:

This is earlier,

and this is later.

There is nothing

that I can perceive, pick up,

or describe.

There's no, what we call,

a precursor lesion

on this CT scan.

Sibyl looked here

and then anticipated that

there would be a problem

based on the baseline

scan. What is it seeing?

That's the million dollar

question.

And, and maybe not

the million dollar question.

Does it really matter? Does it?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

When they compared

the predictions

to actual outcomes from previous

cases, Sybil fared well.

It correctly forecast cancer

between 80% and 95% of the time,

depending on the population

it studied.

The technique is

still in the trial phase.

But once it is deployed,

it could provide

a potent tool for prevention.

The hope is that if you

can predict very early on

that the patient

is in the wrong way,

you can do clinical trials,

you can develop the drugs

that are doing the prevention,

rather than treatment

of very advanced disease

that we are doing today.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Which takes us back to DeepMind

and AlphaGo.

The fun and games

were just the beginning,

a means to an end.

We have always set out

at DeepMind

to, um, use our technologies to

make the world a better place.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

In 2021,

the company released AlphaFold.

It is pattern

recognition software

designed to make

it easier for researchers

to understand proteins,

long chains of amino acids

involved in nearly

every function in our bodies.

How a protein folds

into a specific,

three-dimensional shape

determines how it interacts

with other molecules.

SULEYMAN:

There's this correlation between

what the protein does

and how it's structured.

So if we can predict

how the protein folds,

then say something

about their function.

O'BRIEN:

If we know how a disease's

protein is shaped, or folded,

we can sometimes create

a drug to disable it.

But the shape of millions

of proteins remained a mystery.

DeepMind trained AlphaFold

on thousands of

known protein structures.

It leveraged this knowledge

to predict

200 million protein structures,

nearly all the proteins

known to science.

SULEYMAN:

You take some high-quality

known data,

and you use that to, you know,

make a prediction about how

a similar piece of information

is likely to unfold

over some time series,

and the structure

of proteins is,

you know, in that sense,

no different to

making a prediction in

the game of Go or in Atari

or in a mammography scan,

or indeed,

in a large language model.

KAMYA:

These thin sticks here?

Yeah? They represent

the amino acids

that make up a protein.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Theoretical chemist

Petrina Kamya works for

a company called

Insilico Medicine.

It uses AlphaFold

and its own deep-learning models

to make accurate predictions

about protein structures.

What we're doing in drug design

is we're designing a molecule

that is analogous

to the natural molecule

that binds to the protein,

but instead it will lock it,

if this molecule

is involved in a disease

where it's hyperactive.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

If the molecule fits well,

it can inhibit the

disease-causing proteins.

So you're filtering it down

like you're choosing

an Airbnb or something to,

you know, number of bedrooms,

whatever. To suit your needs.

[laughs]Exactly, right.

Right, yeah. That's a very good analogy.

It's sort of like Airbnb.

So you are putting in

your criteria,

and then Airbnb will filter out

all the different properties

based on your criteria.

So you can be very, very

restrictive

or you can be very,

very free... Right.

In terms of guiding the

generative algorithms

and telling them

what types of molecules

you want them to generate.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It will take 48 to 72 hours

of computing time

to identify the best

candidates ranked in order.

How long would it have taken you

to figure that out

as a computational chemist?

I would have thought of

some of these,

but not all of them.Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

While there are no shortcuts

for human trials,

nor should we hope for that,

this could greatly speed up

the drug development pipeline.

There will not be the need

to invest so heavily

in preclinical discovery,

and so,

drugs can therefore be cheaper.

And you can go

after those diseases

that are otherwise neglected,

because you don't have

to invest so heavily

in order for you

to come up with a drug,

a viable drug.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But medicine isn't

the only place

where A.I. is breaking

new frontiers.

It's conducting

financial analysis,

helps with fraud detection.

[mechanical whirring]

It's now being deployed

to discover novel materials

and could help us build

clean energy technology.

And It is even helping

to save lives

as the climate crisis

boils over.

[indistinct radio chatter]

In St. Helena, California,

dispatchers at the

CAL FIRE Sonoma-Lake-Napa

Command Center

caught a break in 2023.

Wildfires blackened nearly

700 acres of their territory.

We were at 400,000 acres

in 2020.

Something like that would

generate a response from us...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Chief Mike Marcucci has

been fighting fires

for more than 30 years.

MARCUCCI [voiceover]:

Once we started having

these devastating fires,

we needed more intel.

The need for intelligence

is just overwhelming

in today's fire service.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Over the past 20 years,

California

has installed a network

of more than

1,000 remotely operated

pan, tilt, zoom surveillance

cameras on mountaintops.

PETE AVANSINO:

Vegetation fire,

Highway 29 at Doton Road.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

All those cameras generate

petabytes of video.

CAL FIRE partnered with

scientists at U.C. San Diego

to train a neural network

to spot the early signs

of trouble.

It's called ALERT California.

SeLEGUE:

So here's one

that just popped up.

Here's an anomaly.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

CAL FIRE Staff Chief of Fire

and Intelligence Philip SeLegue

showed me how it works

while it was in action,

detecting nascent fires,

micro fires.

That looks like

just a little hint

of some type of smoke

that was there...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Based on this,

dispatchers can orchestrate

a fast response.

A.I. has given us the ability

to detect and to see

where those fires are starting.

AVANSINO:

Transport 1447

responding via MDC.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

For all they know,

they have nipped

some megafires in the bud.

The success are the fires

that you don't hear about

in the news.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Artificial intelligence

can't put out

wildfires just yet.

Human firefighters

still need to do that job.

But researchers are pushing hard

to combine neural networks

with mobility and dexterity.

This is where people

get nervous.

Will they take our jobs?

Or could they turn against us?

But at M.I.T.,

they're exploring ideas

to make robots

good human partners.

We are interested in

making machines

that help people with

physical and cognitive tasks.

So this is really great,

it has the stiffness

that we wanted...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Daniela Rus is director of

M.I.T.'s Computer Science

and Artificial Intelligence Lab.

Oh, can you bring it to me?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

CSAIL.

They are different, like,

kind of like muscles

or actuators.

RUS [voiceover]:

We can do so much more

when we get people and machines

working together.

We can get better reach.

We can get lift,

precision, strength, vision.

All of these are

physical superpowers

we can get through machines.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

So, they're focusing

on making it safe for humans

to work in close proximity

to machines.

They're using some of

the technology that's inside

my prosthetic arm.

Electrodes that can read

the faint EMG signals generated

as our nerves command

our muscles to move.

They have the capability to

interact with a human,

to understand the human,

to step in and help the human

as needed.

I am at your disposal with

187 other languages,

along with their various

dialects and sub tongues.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But making robots as useful

as they are in the movies

is a big challenge.



Most neural networks run on

powerful supercomputers...

Thousands of processors

occupying entire buildings.

RUS:

We have brains that require

massive computation,

which you cannot include

on a self-contained body.

We address the size challenge by

making liquid networks.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Liquid networks.

So it looks like

an autonomous vehicle

like I've seen before,

but it is a little

different, right?

ALEXANDER AMINI:

Very different.

This is an autonomous vehicle

that can drive in

brand-new environments

that it has never seen

before for the first time.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Most self-driving cars

today rely,

to some extent,

on detailed databases

that help them recognize

their immediate environment.

Those robot cars get lost

in unfamiliar terrain.

O'BRIEN:

In this case,

you're not relying on

a huge, expansive

neural network.

You're running on

19 neurons, right?

Correct.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Computer scientist

Alexander Amini

took me on a ride

in an autonomous vehicle

with a liquid neural

network brain.

AMINI:

We've become very accustomed

to relying on

big, giant data centers

and cloud compute.

But in an autonomous vehicle,

you cannot make

such assumptions, right?

You need to be able to operate,

even if you lose

internet connectivity

and you cannot

talk to the cloud anymore,

your entire neural network,

the brain of the car,

needs to live on the car,

and that imposes a lot

of interesting constraints.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

To build a brain smart enough

and small enough to do this job,

they took some inspiration

from nature,

a lowly worm

called C. elegans.

Its brain contains all of

300 neurons,

but it's a very

different kind of neuron.

It can capture

more complex behaviors

in every single piece

of that puzzle.

And also the wiring,

how a neuron talks to

another neuron

is completely different

than what we see

in today's neural networks.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Autonomous cars that tap

into today's neural networks

require huge amounts of

compute power in the cloud.

But this car is using

just 19 liquid neurons.

A worm at the wheel...

sort of.

AMINI [voiceover]:

Today's A.I. models

are really

pushing the boundaries

of the scale of compute

that we have.

They're also pushing

the boundaries

of the data sets that we have.

And that's not sustainable,

because ultimately,

we need to deploy A.I.

onto the device itself, right?

Onto the cars,

onto the surgical robots.

All of these edge devices

that actually makes

the decisions.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The A.I. worm may, in fact,

turn.

The portability of

artificial intelligence

was on my mind when it came time

to pick up

my new myoelectric arm...

equipped with

Coapt A.I. pattern recognition.

All right, let's just check this

real quick...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

A few weeks after

my trip to Chicago,

I met Brian Monroe

at his home office

outside Washington, D.C.

Are you happy with

the way it came out? Yeah.

Would you tell me otherwise?

[laughing]:

Yeah, I would, yeah...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

As usual,

he did a great job

making a tight socket.

How's the socket feel?

Does it feel like

it's sliding down or

falling out... No, it fits like a glove.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It's really important in

this case,

because the electrodes designed

to read the signals

from my muscles...

have to stay in place snugly

in order to generate

accurate, reliable commands

to the actuators in my new hand.

Wait, is that you? That's me.

[voiceover]:

He also provided me with

a human-like bionic hand.

But getting it

to work just right

took some time.

That's open and it's closing.

It's backwards?

Yeah. Now try.

If it's reversed,

I can swap the electrodes. There we go.

That's got it. Is it the right direction?

Yeah.Uh-huh. Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It's a long way from the movies,

and I'm no Luke Skywalker.

But my new arm and I

are now together.

And I'm heartened to know

that I have the freedom

and independence

to teach and tweak it

on my own.

That's kind of cool.Yeah.

[voiceover]:

Hopefully we will listen to

each other.

It's pretty awesome.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But we might want to listen

with a skeptical ear.

JORDAN PEELE [imitating Obama]:

You see, I would never

say these things,

at least not in

a public address,

but someone else would.

Someone like Jordan Peele.

This is a dangerous time.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It's even more dangerous now

than it was in 2018

when comedian Jordan Peele

combined his pitch-perfect

Obama impression

with A.I. software to make

this convincing fake video.

or whether we become some

kind of [bleep] up dystopia.



O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Fakes are about as old as

photography itself.

Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin

all ordered that pictures be

doctored or redacted,

erasing those

who fell out of favor,

consolidating power,

manipulating their followers

through images.

HANY FARID:

They've always been manipulated,

throughout history, but...

There was literally,

you can count on one hand,

the number of people

in the world who could do this.

But now,

you need almost no skill.

And we said, "Give us an image

"of a middle-aged woman,

newscaster,

sitting at her desk,

reading the news."

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Hany Farid is a professor

of computer science

at U.C. Berkeley.

[on computer]:

And this is your daily dose

of future flash.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

He and his team

are trying to navigate

the house of mirrors

that is the world of

A.I.-enabled deepfake imagery.

Not perfect.

She's not blinking,

but it's pretty good.

And by the way, he did this

in a day and a half.

FARID [voiceover]:

It's the

classic automation story.

We have lowered

barriers to entry

to manipulate reality.

And when you do that,

more and more people will do it.

Some good people will do it,

but lots of bad people

will do it.

There'll be some

interesting use cases,

and there'll be a lot of

nefarious use cases.

Okay, so, um...

Glasses off.

How's the framing?

Everything okay?

[voiceover]:

About a week before

I got on a plane to see him... Hold on.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

He asked me to meet him on Zoom

so he could get a good recording

of my voice and mannerisms.

And I assume

you're recording, Miles.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And he turned the table on me

a little bit,

asking me a lot of questions

to get a good sampling.

FARID [on computer]:

How are you feeling about

the role of A.I.

as it enters into our world

on a daily basis?

I think it's very important,

first of all,

to calibrate the concern level.

Let's take it away from

the "Terminator" scenario...

[voiceover]:

The "Terminator" scenario.

Come with me

if you want to live.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

You know, a malevolent

neural network

hellbent on exterminating

humanity.

You're really real.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

In the film series,

the cyborg assassin

is memorably played

by Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Hany thought it would be fun

to use A.I.

to turn Arnold into me.

Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

A week later, I showed up at

Berkeley's

School of Information,

ironically located in

the oldest building on campus.

So you had me do

this strange thing on Zoom.

Here I am.

What did you do with me?

Yeah, well, it's gonna teach you

to let me record

your Zoom call, isn't it?

I did this

with some trepidation.

[voiceover]:

I was excited to see what tricks

were up his sleeve.

FARID [voiceover]:

I uploaded 90 seconds of audio,

and I clicked a box saying

"Miles has given me

permission to use his voice,"

which I don't actually

think you did.

[chuckles]

Um, and, I waited about,

eh, maybe 20 seconds,

and it said, "Okay, what would

you like for Miles to say?"

And I started typing,

and I generated an audio

of you saying

whatever I wanted you to say.

We are synthesizing,

at much, much lower resolution.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

You could have knocked me over

with a feather

when I watched this.

A.I. O'BRIEN:

Terminators were

science fiction back then,

but if you follow the

recent A.I. media coverage,

you might think that Terminators

are just around the corner.

The reality is...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The eyes and the mouth

need some work,

but it sure does sound like me.

And consider what happened

in May of 2023.

Someone posted

this A.I.-generated image

of what appeared to be

a t*rror1st bombing

at the Pentagon.

NEWS ANCHOR:

Today we may have witnessed

one of the first drops

in the feared flood

of A.I.-created

disinformation.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It was shared on Twitter

via what seemed to be

a verified account

from Bloomberg News.

NEWS ANCHOR:

It only took seconds

to spread fast.

The Dow now down about

200 points...

Two minutes later,

the stock market dropped

a half a trillion dollars

from a single fake image.

Anybody could've made

that image,

whether it was intentionally

manipulating the market

or unintentionally,

in some ways,

it doesn't really matter.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

So what are the technological

innovations that make this tool

widely available?

One technique is called

the generative

adversarial network,

or GAN.

Two algorithms

in a dizzying

student-teacher back and forth.

Let's say it's learning how to

generate a cat.

FARID:

And it starts by

just splatting down

a bunch of pixels onto a canvas.

And it sends it over to

a discriminator.

And the discriminator has access

to millions and millions

of images

of the category that you want.

And it says,

"Nope, that doesn't look

like all these other things."

So it goes back to the generator

and says, "Try again."

Modifies some pixels,

sends it back

to the discriminator,

and they do this in

what's called

an adversarial loop.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And eventually,

after many thousands of volleys,

the generator

finally serves up a cat.

And the discriminator says,

"Do more like that."

Today, we have a whole new way

of doing these things.

They're called diffusion-based.

What diffusion does

is it has vacuumed up

billions of images

with captions

that are descriptive.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It starts by making those

labeled images

visually noisy on purpose.

FARID:

And then it corrupts it more,

and it goes backwards

and corrupts it more,

and goes backwards

and corrupts it more

and goes backwards...

And it does that

six billion times.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Eventually it corrupts it

so it's unrecognizable

from the original image.

Now that it knows how

to turn an image into nothing,

it can reverse the process,

turning seemingly nothing,

into a beautiful image.

FARID:

What it's learned is how to take

a completely indescript image,

just pure noise,

and go back to a coherent image,

conditioned on a text prompt.

You're basically

reverse engineering an image

down to the pixel.

Yeah, exactly, yeah.

And it's... and by the way...

If you had asked me,

"Will this work?"

I would have said,

"No, there's no way

this system works."

It just, it just doesn't

seem like it should work.

And that's sort of the magic

of when you get this much data

and very powerful algorithms

and very powerful computing

to be able to crunch

these massive data sets.

I mean, we're not

going to contain it.

That's done.

[voiceover]:

I sat down with Hany

and two of his grad students:

Justin Norman

and Sarah Barrington.

We looked at some

the A.I. trickery

they have seen and made.

Somebody else

wrote some base code

and they got grew on to

and grow on to and

grow on to and eventually...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

In a world where anything

can be manipulated

with such ease

and seeming authenticity,

how are we to know

what's real anymore?

How you look at the world,

how you interact with

people in it,

and where you look for

your threats of that change.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Generative A.I. is now

part of a larger ecosystem

that is built on mistrust.

We're going to live

in a world where

we don't know what's real.

FARID [voiceover]:

There is distrust of

governments,

there is distrust of media,

there is distrust of academics.

And now throw on top of that

video evidence.

So-called video evidence.

I think this is

the very definition

of throwing jet fuel onto

a dumpster fire.

And it's already happening,

and I imagine

we will see more of it.

[Arnold's voice]:

Come with me

if you want to live.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But it also can be

kind of fun.

As Hany promised,

here's my face

on the Terminator's body.

[g*nf*re blasting]

Long before A.I. might take

an existential turn

against humanity,

we will need to

reckon with the likes...

Go! Now! O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Of the Milesinator.

TRAILER NARRATOR:

This time, he's back.

[booming]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Who will no doubt, be back.

Trust me.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Trust,

but always verify.

So, what kind of A.I. magic

is readily available online?

It's pretty simple

to make it look

like you're fluent

in another language.

[speaking Mandarin]:

It was pretty easy to do,

I just had to upload

a video and wait.

[speaking German]:

And, suddenly,

I look pretty darn smart.

[speaking Greek]:

Sure, it's fun,

but I think you can see

where it leads to mischief

and possibly even mayhem.

[voiceover]:

Yoshua Bengio is an

artificial intelligence pioneer.

He says he didn't spend

much time

thinking about

science fiction dystopia

as he was creating

the technology.

But as his brilliant ideas

became reality,

reality set in.

BENGIO:

And the more I read,

the more I thought about it...

the more concerned I got.

If we are not honest

with ourselves,

we're gonna fool ourselves.

We're gonna...

lose.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Avoiding that outcome

is now his main priority.

He has signed

several public warnings

issued by A.I. thought leaders,

including this stark

single-sentence statement

in May of 2023.

"Mitigating the risk of

extinction from A.I.

"should be a global priority

"alongside other

societal scale risks,

"such as pandemics

and nuclear w*r."

As we approach more and more

capable A.I. systems

that might even become stronger

than humans in many areas,

they become

more and more dangerous.

Can't we just pull

the plug on the thing?

Oh, that's

the safest thing to do,

pull the plug.

Before it gets so powerful that

it prevents us from

pulling the plug.

DAVE:

Open the pod bay doors, Hal.

HAL:

I'm sorry, Dave,

I'm afraid I can't do that.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

It may be some time

before computers are able

to act like

movie supervillains...

HAL:

Goodbye.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But there are near-term dangers

already emerging.

Besides deepfakes and

misinformation,

A.I. can also supercharge bias

and hate content,

replace human jobs...

This is why we're striking,

everybody.[crowd exclaiming]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

And make it easier

for t*rrorists

to create bioweapons.

And A.I. systems are so complex

that they are difficult

to comprehend,

all but impossible to audit.

RUS [voiceover]:

Nobody really understands

how those systems

reach their decisions.

So we have to be

much more thoughtful

about how we

test and evaluate them

before releasing them.

They're concerned

whether machine will be able

to begin to think for itself.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

The U.S. and Europe have begun

charting a strategy

to try to ensure safe, secure,

and trustworthy

artificial intelligence.

RISHI SUNAK:

in a way that will

be safe for our communities...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

But how to do that

in the midst of a frenetic race

to dominate a technology

with a predicted economic impact

of 13 trillion dollars by 2030.

There is such a strong

commercial incentive

to develop this

and win the competition

against the other companies,

not to mention

the other countries,

that it's hard

to stop that train.

But that's what

governments should be doing.

NEWS ANCHOR:

The titans of social media

didn't want to come to

Capitol Hill.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

Historically, the tech industry

has bridled against regulation.

You have an army of lawyers

and lobbyists

that have fought us on this...

SULEYMAN [voiceover]:

There's no question that

guardrails

will slow things down,

But, the risks are uncertain

and potentially enormous.

So, it makes sense for us

to start having

the conversation right now.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:

For me, the conversation

about A.I. is personal.

Okay, no network detected.

Okay, um...

Oh, here we go.Okay.

And now I'm going to open,

open, open, open, open...

[voiceover]:

I used the Coapt app

to train the A.I.

inside my new prosthetic.



It says all of my

training data is good,

it's four of five stars.

And now let's try to close.

[whirring]

All right.

Seems to be doing

what it was told.

[voiceover]:

Was my new arm listening?

Maybe.

I decided to make things

simpler.

I took off the hand and

attached a myoelectric hook.

[quietly]:

All right.

[voiceover]:

Function over form.

Not a conversation piece

necessarily at a c*ck party

like this thing is.

This looks more like

Luke Skywalker, I suppose.

But this thing has a tremendous

amount of function to it.

Although, right now,

it wants to stay open.

[voiceover]:

And that problem persisted.

Find a tripod plate...

[voiceover]:

When I tried using it

to set up my basement studio

for a live broadcast.

Come on, close.

[voiceover]:

I was quickly frustrated.

[item drops, audio beep]

Really annoying.

Not useful.

[voiceover]:

The hook continuously

opened on its own.

[clattering]Damn it!

[voiceover]:

So I completely reset

and retrained the arm.

And... reset,

there we go.

Add data...

[voiceover]:

But the software was

artificially unhappy.

"Electrodes are not

making good skin contact."

Maybe that is my problem,

ultimately.

[voiceover]:

My problem really is

I haven't given this

enough time.

Amputees tell me it can take

many months to really learn

how to use an arm like this one.

The choke point isn't

artificial intelligence.

Dead as a doornail.

[voiceover]:

But rather, what is the best way

to communicate

my intentions to it?

Little reboot there, I guess.

All right.

Close.

Open, close.

[voiceover]:

It turns out machine learning

isn't smart enough to

give me a replacement arm

like Luke Skywalker got.

Nor is it capable

of creating the Terminator.

Right now, it seems many

hopes and fears

for artificial intelligence...

Oh!

[voiceover]:

are rooted

in science fiction.

But we are walking down a road

to the unknown.

The door is opening to

a revolution.

[door closes]