Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

01x02 - The People v. Scott Peterson

Episode transcripts for the TV show, "Face to Face with Scott Peterson". Aired: August 20, 2024.*
Watch/Buy Amazon


A new look at the notorious case of Scott Peterson and the murders of his wife Laci Peterson and unborn son Conner.

01x02 - The People v. Scott Peterson

Post by bunniefuu »

[somber music]



Hey, Shareen.

Hi, Scott. How are you?

I should tell you

this in advance.

I'm looking at the

clock here. It's 1:18.

It's supposed to

be a 1:30 lockup,

so we may only get 12 minutes.

OK.

I'm not sure what they'll do.

I have a few questions

for you today.

After the world basically

heard your phone calls

with Amber Frey,

they came to the conclusion

that you k*lled Laci.

How does that make you feel?

Why didn't you tell

the police right away

about Amber Frey?

[ominous music]



Police in Modesto,

California, continue searching

for 27-year-old Laci Peterson.

[dramatic music]

As the investigation

into the disappearance

of Laci Peterson continues,

police are tracking

her husband's movements

outside the Modesto,

California, area.

Even as the focus of the search

appears to be shifting

towards Scott,

Modesto Police have still

not named him as a suspect.



I'm Mike Gudgell.

I've been involved

in the Peterson case

for almost two decades now.

In 2002, I was

working for ABC News

as an editorial producer.

When I first arrived, a couple

of days after Christmas Day,

it was quite a crowd of media

surrounding the house

police checkpoints,

satellite trucks.

It was what I call a complete

media feeding frenzy.

By then, we really hadn't

established sources

with the police,

but we were hearing they

were focused on Scott.

We heard that the Petersons

had hired a private

investigator.

We understood he was

talking to witnesses

who saw Laci alive

after Scott left.

That might be

different than what

we're hearing from the police.

A beautiful young

lady, very pregnant.

Walking across the street.

Walking, like, towards the park.

The fact is, within

a 30, 40-minute time,

there were five or six

witnesses who saw Laci.

So we knew that the police

narrative wasn't solid.

And then we heard that there

had been a burglary next door.

We had a burglary that was

reported to have occurred

directly across the street from

the residence in question here.

We're outside the home of

Scott and Laci Peterson's home

in Modesto, 523 Covena.

We want to show you

directly across the street.

That's 516, known

as the Medina home,

that had a burglary happen

right around the time frame

of Laci Peterson's

disappearance.

The Medinas left December

24th at about 10:30 AM.

They returned home December 26th

at about 4:30 in

the afternoon.

During the time frame

while they were gone

is when Laci was

reported missing.

When the news of the

burglary came out,

we assumed immediately

that it would be

a big break in the case.

Really kind of went, oh, OK,

we're getting somewhere now.

This could be the best

lead that we've had.

The police were now not

only trying to figure out

what happened to Laci,

but they were trying to

solve the Medina burglary,

thinking that this burglary

potentially had something to

do with what happened to Laci.

The issue around the burglary

is when did it happen?

On the 24th, the day

Laci went missing,

a neighbor of Scott and

Laci was driving home.

I was coming home from

the hand therapist

and drove by Laci's house.

And I thought, "Oh,

who are those people

on the Medinas' front lawn?"

And they were right

next to a van.

One door was a little open.

They turned around

and looked at me,

and I felt hostility.

But I didn't think

anything of it.

I thought, "Well,

I don't need to be

"looking at them or

waving or anything.

I'll just go on home."

When she heard

about this burglary

and then the news of

Laci's disappearance,

she came forward and thought,

"Oh, maybe this is important."

Diane Jackson described the

three men as dark skinned

but not African American.

A thousand dollars for someone

that leads us to the persons

responsible for the burglary.

They had put out a reward.

On the reward flyer,

they used the information

that they'd gotten

from Diane Jackson.

You're looking for a van.

You're looking for three men.

They put a senior detective

from the Major Crimes Unit

on it, got an informant

almost immediately.

They've actually made two

arrests in that today.

Modesto Police

arrested two suspects,

Steven Todd and Donald Pearce.

Their cooperation level

was off the charts.

They both polygraphed.

They wanted the polygraphs

released to the media

because they wanted the

people in the jail to know

that they were not

involved in this case.

Steven Todd and Glen Pearce,

neither one of them is dark

skinned, not African American.

But also, neither one of them

has ever been

associated with a van.

They said that they used a car

and a bike to commit

the burglaries.

The informant told police

that up to five people

were involved, and

they didn't look into

any of the others.

Well, I'd like to see who

these additional people are

and where they came

up with the idea

that additional

people were involved

in the burglary itself.

I don't see anything

that would suggest that.

Diane Jackson claimed

that she saw a van

across the street from the

Peterson house on the 24th.

She couldn't even really confirm

what the color of the van was.

And when you have that

kind of discrepancy,

when it comes to even the

description of the vehicle,

it calls into question the

reliability of that witness.

At this point, there

is no connection.

There's no leads to indicate

that they were involved

in the missing of Laci.

We solved that burglary.

Found out that it, in

fact, occurred on the 26th.

Steven Todd says that the

burglary was on the 26th,

but that's according

to the burglar.

He changed it.

He picked, "Oh, it

happened on December 27th.

Oh, no, it was the 26th."

So it wasn't very

reliable, that's for sure.

I thought, "Well, that's

quite interesting,"

because on the 26th,

there was a lot of activity

on Scott and Laci's street,

and how could burglars

get in and out

without anybody seeing them?

I thought it was

highly improbable

that that was the truth.

They solved that

burglary really quickly.

But there's a distinction

that needs to be made

between solving the burglary

and saying it didn't

have anything to do

with Laci's disappearance.

I find that pretty unbelievable.

That would be an

incredible coincidence.

One of the lead investigators,

Jon Buehler, often told me,

there are no coincidences

in m*rder investigations.

[suspenseful music]

Todd and Pearce,

the two that we know

burgled the house

across the street.

We don't know who else

was in that burglary.

We know there were others.

There was just no

desire to pursue

what the evidence

was telling them.

I mean, it was the evidence

that they just decided

to ignore and go with theory.

Today marking the

one-month anniversary

of Laci Peterson's

disappearance.

Police right now

expected any moment now

to walk up to the podium

and give us the very latest

on their investigation.

The press conference of

of all press conferences

was when they marched

out Amber Frey.

I am very sorry

for Laci's family

and the the pain that

this has caused them.

Amber changed everything.

She became the focus.

Wow, what a development that is.

The missing woman's

apparently perfect marriage

may not have been so perfect.

That he'd been having an affair.

And we felt that if he had

not been truthful about that,

that possibly

there's other things

he needs to talk to us about.

Support for Scott

Peterson has wavered

since police told Laci's family.

I would like Scott to

know that I trusted him

and stood by him in

the initial phases

of my sister's disappearance.

However, Scott has not been

forthcoming with information

regarding my sister's

disappearance,

and I'm only left to question

what else he may be hiding.

Scott had been declining

interview requests consistently.

Now, when Amber

Frey is out there,

nobody's looking for Laci.

Everybody thinks he's guilty.

So he decided, all right,

I'll do a few interviews.

Did you m*rder your wife?

No, no. I did not.

And I had absolutely nothing

to do with her disappearance.

In that interview

with Diane Sawyer,

Scott makes the

outlandish claim that

I told my wife.

He told Laci about the affair,

and she was OK with it.

There wasn't a lot of anger?

No.

Do you really expect

people to believe

that an 8 and 1/2

month pregnant woman

learns her husband

has had an affair

and makes a peace with it?

Well, I yeah,

you don't know.

No one knows our

relationship but us.

That was the nail in his coffin.

This is ludicrous, the idea

that Laci knew about Amber.

He came across as

being disingenuous.

And in a couple of cases,

just lied right out.

Had you told anyone?

Did you tell police?

I told the police immediately.

- When?

- December 24th.

Laci Peterson's

husband admits he lied

about his extramarital

affair with Amber Frey.

When you're in a

hole, stop digging.

He shot himself in the

foot so many times,

he ought to be on crutches.

That's when the

word "psychopath"

started to creep in in

some of the reports.

He did four interviews,

I believe, total.

One of the interviews

he did was with me.

Well, the polygraph is

another one of those things.

I'm not saying I have.

I'm not saying I haven't.

There's no winning.

You can never

present the reality.

If you go out and

you do an interview,

it's gonna be edited.

It's gonna be awful.

Amber Frey claims that you

called her on the 24th,

told her that you were

going to Brussels.

Yeah, this is a short newscast,

and I don't know how

much of these words

you're going to use or not.

But I'm not gonna waste

that by defending myself,

talking about irrelevant things.

He looked like a narcissistic,

lying k*ller.

I've had people spit

on me at gas stations.

I've received death

threats on the phone.

I had someone in the front yard

claiming they were a witch,

burying things in

the front lawn.

I wish I could say

I was stronger,

but all that stuff

did take a toll on me.

I just remembered

how insane I was

going with no sleep

and worried about

Conner and Laci

and what seemed like

just a apathetic response

from the police department.

Scott's behavior fit into things

that we've seen before

with other m*rder cases

limited cooperation level,

his cool, calm demeanor

when everybody else

was just frantic.

And there were too many other

circumstantial evidence

items to ignore.

It started to become

increasingly obvious to us

that they would be

found in the bay.

[tense music]



The search in the waters

just outside the Berkeley

Marina began early.

17 divers from Alameda

County loaded up on boats

and swept the floor

of the open water

just outside of the marina.

Scott had given us a detailed

description of how he had

gone out of the marina,

and he'd gone to the north,

and he found this

island, which turned out

to be Brooks Island,

with a sign that said,

you're not supposed

to leave your boat

and walk around on the island.

So it seemed obvious

that he probably

let her go in the area

right by Brooks Island

in the Berkeley Marina.



My name is Danny Lopez.

I was the officer in

charge of the San Francisco

Police Department Marine Patrol.

We're retracing

Scott Peterson's trip

on the 24th.

Dead ahead is the Brooks Island.

The reason that it's

difficult to find somebody

in the San Francisco

Bay is the visibility

is probably about this much.

This is the location that we

were spending most of our time.

That's where the grid

searches were done,

the side-scan sonar,

the underwater searches,

cadaver dogs.

We're continuing

our search today,

and we're concentrating on

on several different things.

We were on that water every day,

sometimes with multiple boats,

multiple water cadaver dogs,

helicopters.

The number of

searches in that bay

probably was in

the mid-500 range.

It's a lot of area to cover.

It was looking for a needle

in the haystack blindfolded.

One of those things

that you just do it.

You have to give

closure to the family.

[tense music]

I think the way it

started to affect me

and others was the fact that

it was a pregnant

mother that was missing.

We keep searching

till we find her.

I'll just keep carrying this on,

and my family will

understand why I'm not home.

And I felt like I was

looking for my sister.

[somber music]



You can't help to get

a personal attachment

over a period of time.



This is a good good

point of reference.

Another part of the search was

to look for devices, anchors,

homemade anchors,

anything that would

have kept a body submerged.

We found two homemade anchors.

They were cylindrical.

They looked like they were

formed in a large coffee can

or maybe a paint can.

It was determined that

they were not connected

to the Scott Peterson

investigation,

so they were thrown

back into the bay.

But I thought it was odd

that we didn't put

them into evidence

and examine them.

After months and

months of searching

with multiple agencies,

they were never recovered.

The district

attorney at the time,

he said, "Hey, if you

don't bring me a body,

you don't have a filing."

We're getting to that

point where there really

wasn't anything coming in.

We were resurrecting some old

tips and clearing those out,

but nothing ground shaking

until we get to April.

[ominous music]



In 2003, I was a police officer

with the East Bay

Regional Park District.

One day during briefing,

one of our sergeants

made a comment

"I bet she'll show

up at Point Isabel."

His experience, it was

that the way the tides flow

in San Francisco Bay,

that more than once,

they had had bodies

that had been recovered

from the area of Point Isabel.



A female adult body was

discovered late this morning

by a woman walking the

shoreline at Point Isabel

in the city of Richmond.

You could see a deceased female

lying face down

on the shoreline.

Her body was in terrible,

obviously very

decomposed condition.

One of the things that

I noticed on her body

was a strip of duct tape that

was on the front of her torso.

My first reaction

was, "We better notify

the Modesto Police Department."

I remember vividly

being in my car

and hearing it on the radio

that a body had been found

and that an infant body had

also been found the day before.

No word yet on whether the

two bodies found in the bay

are those of Laci

Peterson and her baby.

The lab results could

come any time now.



So frankly, we thought because

there hadn't been

an announcement

You know, it wasn't unheard of.

There was

there's been other

bodies, you know,

on the bay before.

There's some people who've

driven into the bay,

and their bodies were found.

So it wasn't like it was

the only possibility.

[tense music]

The bodies hadn't been

confirmed as Laci and Conner,

although it looked

likely that they were.

We put a team of guys

on Scott right away.

We were gonna just watch him

until the attorney general

released the DNA evidence.

We still had a

wiretap on his phone,

so we could hear what he was

saying, talking to his brother.

[tense music]

[suspenseful music]

The next day, all of a sudden,

Scott started moving

very early in the day.

And so the chase was on.



Yeah, see that tangle?

I'll be right there.

Ah, that's nice right there.

The fish, oh, yeah.

All right, look at that monster.

I wanted to talk

more about the arrest

and what that day

was like for you.

Action photo.

It may seem odd to other

people, but, like

Look at the camera.

And be together.

And then when I

got on the road

I don't want a picture of me

being taken and, you know,

splashed on a tabloid.

I just could imagine

what the headlines were.

Scott was very good at

counter-surveillance driving.

As he would drive

along at high speeds,

he would brake

heavily and cut lanes.

We were concerned that he

was gonna get into a wreck

or he was gonna create a

traffic collision behind him

because of his evasive moves.

And so we made a

decision that if

if he hurt somebody,

we're gonna be in trouble.

So let's arrest him.

[sirens wailing]

We were stopped at the

entrance to Torrey Pines.

[camera clicks]

When Scott got out

of the car, he was

he was Scott.

There was no protest.

"You got the wrong guy.

"Why am I in cuffs?

"What are you doing?

Why aren't you guys

looking for the k*ller?"

[camera clicks]

He dyed his hair to

a different color,

grown a goatee,

which further

disguised him slightly

so maybe he wouldn't be noticed.

Searched his car.

He had cell phones.

He had Viagra.

He had everything you need

from going to a gala

to a camping trip.

He could dig a gold mine.

Most people don't drive

around with $10,000 cash

and their brother's

driver's license.

And some people had said

that maybe he was

fleeing to Mexico.

He could easily go anywhere

he wanted and fit in.

I don't understand that at all,

because I just want to be clear.

I was never running

from the police.

I was always in

contact with them.

I'd answer most of their calls.

There were times that

I was very frustrated,

that I would not

take their calls.

I found out he was

arrested about 2:00.

It was

it was just we

were just in shock.

We were in we were

in absolute shock.

So we had to make arrangements

and travel to Modesto

and attend his arraignment.

[tense music]

Police in California said

today that m*rder suspect

Scott Peterson had $10,000

in cash when he was arrested

near the Mexican border.

He had some cash in his car.

His brother, John, was gonna

buy Scott's truck from him,

so he gave Scott the cash

to buy Scott out of his truck.

And Scott was still

carrying that cash

at the point that

he was arrested.

He had changed his appearance.

Police feared he might be

preparing to flee to Mexico.

That's a narrative we

still battle to this day.

Scott was spending a lot of

time with family in San Diego.

I live in San Diego.

His parents lived in San Diego.

And San Diego borders Mexico.

So when Scott was arrested,

the national headline was

"Scott was arrested 30 miles

from the Mexican border."

The bodies had been

found five days before,

but we still had not heard

a positive identification.

Then I want to say within

a couple of hours of that

was the press conference.

There is no question

in our minds

that the unidentified female

is Laci Peterson.

The unidentified fetus

is the biological child

of Laci and Scott Peterson.

[sniffles]

We were not notified.

We heard it like everyone else.

And we were crushed.

All of the fear that we

had in Laci being missing

and the pins and needles that

you know, and the ups and downs

that we went through

for the past four months

had really

now, it's hit rock bottom.

[somber music]



After Scott was arrested,

we started driving back

from San Diego to Modesto.

[somber music]



When Scott received this news,

I just recall Scott making

kind of like a sniffling noise,

and that was it.

There wasn't any

hysterics, no screams.

"No, it can't be!"

No theatrics, nothing like that.

He bowed his head and

pushed out a tear.

He was quiet. He

didn't say nothing.



15 miles later, when we stopped,

he ate a double double,

you know, from In-N-Out,

and a shake and a fries

and gobbled it all

down just like nothing,

just like we're just

coming home from fishing.

The police report says

that Scott had a tear

coming down his face.

He'd been in custody

for hours at this point,

and he's he's

going to county jail.

The perception and the

way it's presented is

it's as though Scott was told

his wife and son were dead

and he ordered a cheeseburger

five minutes later.

[ominous music]

Well, now we can move forward.

And now justice can be done.

Soon after Laci went missing,

I made a promise to her

that if she has been

harmed, we will seek justice

for her and Conner and

make sure that that person

responsible for their

for their deaths

will be punished.

[tense music]

What became a fight to find Laci

then became a fight

to save Scott's life.



Shortly after midnight,

when investigators

escorted Scott Peterson

to the Stanislaus County Jail,

a crowd of 250 taunted

and heckled him,

calling him a m*rder*r.

I just hope he gets the same

death that he gave his family.

Call the case of The People

versus Scott Lee Peterson.

Under tight security,

Scott Peterson,

wearing chains on his

wrists and ankles,

was walked into a packed

Modesto courtroom today.

Once Scott was arraigned,

we were looking for an attorney,

and my parents had watched

"The Larry King Show"

for the last several months.

That's really where we

first met Mark Geragos.

This case is intriguing,

if for nothing else,

is that the more there's a

l*nch m*b mentality out there

for him, the more

that it's intriguing.

They hired him.

He was media savvy.

He seemed like he

had a good team.

I just wanted to say that

we're happy that Mark is

in place as Scott's attorney,

and we do look forward

to proving his innocence.

I'm Lara Yeretsian,

and I'm a criminal defense

attorney of over two decades.

We got the case in 2003.

I was a young attorney.

This case was on

a whole new level.

27-year-old mom-to-be,

eight months pregnant.

As the investigation into the

disappearance of Laci Peterson

continues, police are

- Though neither the victim

nor the accused

was famous before,

the Peterson case has now

taken on celebrity status.

I'd handled a number of cases,

but nothing that came close

to the magnitude of this case.

The interest was so

intense in this case.

I just remember walking

with Mark Geragos

towards the courthouse.

People would come up

to us with questions.

And it wasn't just the media.

Mark, can we get a

quick word with ya?

- Right now? How about after?

- OK.

People would even ask

for Mark's autograph.

I mean, he had

become a celebrity.

Thank you very much.

I'll see you guys on Thursday.

Come on. Come on, be

human beings right now.

There was a lot of

anger, palpable anger,

towards Scott Peterson.

[suspenseful music]

And everybody had an

opinion about this case.

Every single person I

knew had an opinion.

And I can tell you,

every single person

believed that he was guilty.



Michael Cardoza.

Top defense attorney

in the area,

who was in the courtroom today.

I'm Michael Cardoza.

I've been a criminal defense

attorney for over 45 years.

And at that time, I was

doing some legal commentary

on "The Larry King Show."

Here's what this case

boils down to, Larry.

There are three things.

The defense team came

to me and asked me

if I would do a mock

cross-examination

of Scott Peterson.

I went into jail. I walked in.

I sat down. They

brought Scott in.

And I began my

cross-examination.

I cannot tell you how

and what happened,

but you can imagine, you know,

what questions were asked.

And they made a decision

he wasn't going to testify.

I hope he goes to prison

for the rest of his life.

I'm just glad that

the animal got caught.

What you have to remember is

you're putting a man up there

who was hated by America.

And then you witnessed

the previous interviews

and how poorly he did there.

You know what?

It's a positive to allow us

to go on to search for Laci.

Why would you expect

he's gonna do a 180

and come across convincing

the jury that he didn't do it?

I think if you put Scott

Peterson on the stand,

he would have been eaten alive.



Opening statements begin

today in the double-m*rder

trial of Scott Peterson.

Scott Peterson's case is

a character evidence case

and nothing else.

But the smoke and mirrors to it

is the suggestion that

there's a great deal

of circumstantial

evidence. There isn't.

There's an affair, and there's

the location of the bodies.

That's the entire case.

People don't wrap

themselves in duct tape

and then go jump in

the San Francisco Bay

in the middle of winter.

The state knew the

problems with their case.

They didn't know how he

did it, when he did it,

but they knew that he

was a liar, a cheater.

And they relied on that.

All of these things

were impossible.

If those things were impossible,

then this man m*rder*d

Laci Peterson.

They just didn't have

anything of substance.

So we felt very good

and very confident.

If the court wants to talk

about prejudicial publicity,

having poster-sized pictures

of him labeled as a monster

in chains, I don't think is

is somehow conducive to

getting a fair trial.

My first impression was

that the Geragos team

was very professional

and were prepared for this.

Mark Geragos comes out

in his opening

statement and says,

"Yes, he's a cheater.

Yes, he's a 14-carat A-hole,

but he's not a k*ller."

Now, on the prosecuting

attorney side,

I didn't feel that way.

I thought that they

were bumbling it.

Scott Peterson's

tone and demeanor

following Laci's disappearance

are being called into question.

This after prosecutors played

a taped police interview

with him describing what he did

the day Laci disappeared.

Day one, there was

a mistake made.

Scott says that the morning

of Laci's disappearance

The prosecution claims

that Martha Stewart

wasn't talking about

meringue that morning,

that they say this is

evidence he was lying.

Geragos brings it in.

He says, "Let's roll the

tape," and you see it.

Ooh, you want to make

little meringues?

Oh, that would be nice.

The prosecution got it wrong.

And this happens at

the jump of the trial.

- Did you check these windows?

- Yeah.

You don't commit a violent crime

without getting

your hands dirty.

The police ex*cuted

more than 10 search

warrants on the home

and his place of business.

Officers began a search

of the couple's home

late last night.

After they found pretty

much zero physical evidence

in the house or in the

truck or in the boat,

the theory had to become

that this was a soft k*ll.

A soft k*ll is a m*rder that

doesn't involve a weapon,

that doesn't leave

behind essentially

obvious forensic evidence.

The coroner has yet to

determine the cause of death.

Unless there is a pretty good

cause of death in the torso,

they're stuck.

How was this person k*lled?

We don't know.

And throughout the trial,

we never found out.

Even a soft k*ll leaves

behind some sort of trail.

If he kills her

and is dragging her

around to his workshop

and then to the

San Francisco Bay,

how did he pull that off?

It's what you say when you

have absolutely no evidence

that there was a crime

that occurred in this home.

But if they were

being fair about it,

they'd also have to

acknowledge, "By the way,

"given the state and

condition of the bodies

"when we finally found

them, there's no evidence

that it was a soft k*ll."

[upbeat music]

Tonight, day nine of Scott

Peterson's m*rder trial,

and his attorney, Mark Geragos,

grills police on the stand.

Detective Al Brocchini

was the first investigator

on the scene the day Laci

Peterson was reported missing.

He was pretty hard on me.

You know, Geragos was.

I was the bad guy.

Every mistake I made, he

turned it into a whole day

of talking about it.

Detective Brocchini

was a little forgetful

from time to time.

In cross-examination,

the defense already

questioning his motives.

I testified that nobody

knew Scott had a boat.

He says Laci knew he had a

boat, but we can't ask her.

Brocchini felt like it

will strengthen his case

if he makes it look like Laci

didn't even know about the boat.

She didn't even know.

That hugely backfired on him.

Geragos scored the most points

when Brocchini took the stand

because Brocchini had redacted

a piece of his report.

We interviewed everybody

in all those shops

near the warehouse,

and I interviewed a man

that said Laci used

the bathroom of a lady

that owned a shop on the 23rd,

the day before Laci

was actually missing.

So when I got my report

back, I deleted that line.

Geragos, he's like,

"What happened?

Who took that line out

of your police report?"

And I said, "I did."

Ah.

That's a big moment.

I I eliminated some

exculpatory evidence

from my police report.

I can't reply.

I can't say, "Well,

it's in Holmes's report.

He's got it all in there."

All it takes, one juror to say,

"I don't believe that detective.

He had an agenda."

Legal analysts say

they've heard nothing yet

that they think would convince

a jury to convict Peterson.

We believed that there

was no way they were gonna

be able to show

this case, prove it,

because the jury is gonna see

that this was nonsensical.

It made no sense.

It felt to me like the

Modesto Police Department

had basically put their

sights on Scott Peterson

and that they put all

their eggs in one basket.

Geragos was able to just seed

each one of these

state witnesses

with reasonable doubt.

The analytical research

studying micro-expressions

of people's faces.

It was unbelievable

how Mark Geragos took

over that courtroom.

The defense was winning.

We've set the bar

extremely high.

And that's to prove that Scott

is not only factually innocent,

but to figure out

exactly who it is

did this horrible

thing to Scott's wife

and to Scott's son.

By its nature, a

defense attorney's job

is not to prove anything.

It's simply to demonstrate

that this package

with the bow on top

that the state is trying

to create for you,

it it it doesn't exist.

It's not real.

But Mark Geragos's

statements said,

"We're not just going to

plant reasonable doubt.

"We're going to prove

that Scott Peterson

is stone-cold innocent."

Those were the words.

The actual perpetrator

is still out there.

We plan on finding that person.

Experts say, normally,

a defense attorney wouldn't

make promises to a jury,

but defense attorney Mark

Geragos made several.

That's what sticks

with the jury.

But the problem

is, he overpromised

and under-delivered.

Mark Geragos is great

on cross-examination,

and he's tripping the police

up in a lot of little details.

The reality is that

those little details

may not add up to a

not guilty verdict.

If you had a graph in terms

of the strength of the defense

and the persuasiveness

of the cross-examination,

it wanes over time.

Tonight, Scott

Peterson's former lover,

Amber Frey, finally

takes the stand

at his double-m*rder trial.

There was a major

shift in this case

when Amber Frey appeared.

Jurors heard Amber Frey

accuse Scott Peterson

of planning the m*rder

of his pregnant wife.

It wasn't what she testified to.

It was that through her

testimony and in her testimony,

we heard all of those tapes.

The prosecution did something

I'd never seen before or since.

They had printed

out the transcripts

of every single phone call.

It was so compelling

not to just hear it,

but to be able to

make notes on it.

And you could see the

jurors making notes.

You know, here's where he

said, "I lost my wife."

Here's the date.

Here's this call.

Here's this call.

The Amber tapes were clearly

one of the worst pieces

of evidence in the case.

It showed a side of him

that was comfortably lying.

If you could have heard

this testimony today,

the credibility of Scott

Peterson is now on the line.

The defense made a

decision not to bring up

any of these

dog-walking eyewitnesses

that thought they saw Laci.

The prosecution

and law enforcement

had done a beautiful job

of trying to discredit

these people.

They made these people think

that what they were saying

was not accurate.

Some of them thought,

"Are we going crazy?

Is it possible that

it wasn't her?"

And guess what happens

to that witness?

That becomes a weak

witness for the defense.

Had anybody put witnesses on

the stand that would support

the claim that Laci

was walking the dog,

that would have made

a lot of difference.

If somebody actually

really saw Laci,

then, yes, that

would be important.

Didn't happen.

And and I think that

people second guessed

Mark Geragos specifically

for that decision.

The judge believed that

the burglary and Laci's

disappearance were

unrelated and wouldn't allow

any evidence in the trial.

Everyone discounted the burglary

because they believed

that it happened

after Laci's disappearance.

It meant the jury didn't hear

evidence about the burglary.

Without the Medina burglary

being admitted into evidence,

there's no other alternate

theory that can explain

Laci Peterson's disappearance.

Part of the problem was they

wanted to get the trial over

as soon as possible so

he would be exonerated

and continue with his life.

And I think that was a mistake

because I really don't think

the defense had enough time

to really understand the case

to defend it properly.

And, gosh, I look

back on that now,

and I wonder if that

was the right decision.

We had the evidence

of my innocence.

It was a nightmare being

stuck in county jail.

And I kind of

wonder, gosh, if I

If I had been more prudent

or patient or whatever,

maybe things would've

been different.

The Scott Peterson m*rder

trial may go to the jury today.

This man m*rder*d Laci Peterson.

The prosecutor, in

his closing argument,

says, look at this

as a jigsaw puzzle.

You need to put the pieces

of the puzzle together.

Is it a coincidence

that Scott Peterson

was looking at tide charts?

Is it a coincidence

that Scott Peterson

told Amber Frey he lost his wife

the same month that she died?

Is it a coincidence that

there was cement found,

anchor circles in his warehouse?

All these things

add up to m*rder.

The prosecution came with

this very deliberate argument

that it's open and shut.

This is a man who was

staring down the barrel

of domesticity with his wife

and this child on the way,

that he wanted nothing

to do with any of that.

The facts are borne out in

the extramarital relationship

he's having and the things that

he is saying to his mistress.

In his closing argument,

defense attorney Mark Geragos

told jurors that prosecutors

wanted them to hate Peterson,

but that was not reason

enough to convict him.

It's hard to be critical,

but I was uncomfortable

when the defense rested.

You must not be biased

against the defendant

because he has been

arrested for this offense,

charged with a crime,

or brought to trial.

After being instructed by

the judge for nearly an hour,

the six men and six

women of the jury

will now decide Scott

Peterson's fate.

We went through things that

were key points to each person.

We did take polls to find out

what people were concerned about

and what we needed answers to.

Are we ready to make a decision,

or are there other things

that need to be answered?

What questions do we have?

That's why our deliberation

took the time it did

because everybody had questions

and different

opinions of things.

I was counting on a jury

that would come back

with an acquittal

because I thought,

there's no evidence here.

There's no forensic evidence.

There's nothing to

tie him to the m*rder.

Everything in this

case you can look at

from a different lens.

Take one piece of

evidence and look at it

from the state's side.

And then you take

that exact same fact

and look at it from

Scott Peterson's side.

And you can make an argument

of those components

of this case.

116 people waited to get

the chance at witnessing

the verdict being read.

The decision coming

after more than 40 hours

of deliberations.

Across the country,

millions of Americans

familiar with the faces

of this unfolding drama

could only listen to

its final moments.



We walked back

into the courtroom.



I just remember I

was really, really

I was perspiring.

I mean, I was

I could feel my heart pounding.

One of the toughest

moments for any lawyer

is the moment right before

the jury foreman

reads the verdict.

It almost feels like

your heart is gonna stop.

A crowd outside the

Redwood City Courthouse

waited in tense silence

for the verdict.

We find the defendant,

Scott Lee Peterson,

guilty of the crime of m*rder.

[cheering]

There were cheers,

too, in Modesto,

Laci Peterson's hometown.

[cheering]

Inside the courtroom,

even the judge

seemed to choke with emotion.

Laci Peterson's family sobbed.

But Scott Peterson showed

no obvious reaction.

I looked at my dad, and he had

a shocked look on his face.

I had a shocked look.

I couldn't even cry.

I was just, like, stunned.

A lot of people are

not fooled by

by what went on here.

This is just a travesty.

When the clerk read the verdict,

I just remember thinking that

that I'd just missed

the word "not."

She must have just

said "not guilty."

I missed it.

And you could hear a crowd

outside the courthouse erupt.

Oh, we got him. That's it.

I'm happy. Thank God!

Thank God!

I don't know how

else to describe it

other than absolute shock.

Our family's going to make it.

We're stronger because of this.

And Scott got what he deserved.

I don't think that Amber

Frey was was the issue.

I think that this

this had been planned

before Amber Frey

even got in the picture.

I've had people after the

trial come up to me and say,

"Was he really guilty?"

And I go, are you serious?

I would find somebody

that was innocent guilty?

I would never do that.

We just said a man

was guilty of k*lling

his wife and unborn child.

That's a terrible thing.

What's there to cheer about?

Nobody on that jury wanted

to find Scott Peterson guilty

just for the sake of

finding him guilty

or because of public opinion.

My decision

was nothing more

than what I found

based on evidence and testimony.

Seeing what we saw,

I'm a mother of four.

g*dd*mn, that was his son.

He'll never come clean.

He'll never admit it.

He'll go to his grave with

it, and then he'll go to hell,

straight to hell and rot.

Peterson has been found guilty

of first and

second-degree m*rder.

Now, Scott Peterson is

eligible for the death penalty.

[tense music]

The jury finds him guilty.

And then the question

is, what's the penalty?

Do you get life in prison?

Do you get the death penalty?

We're gonna have

to ask this jury,

who thinks that he m*rder*d

his wife and unborn son,

to not take his life.

Hi, everyone. First

up on the docket,

while you were eating your

Thanksgiving turkey at home,

Scott Peterson was

eating his behind bars,

waiting for the penalty

phase of his trial to begin.

Witnesses reminded the

jury the emotional toll

a death verdict would

have on Scott's parents.

The defense is hoping

for an ounce of sympathy

peppered with lingering doubt.

This afternoon, customers

gathered at the bar

to watch the jury's

penalty decision on TV.

[applause]

After calling him cruel,

uncaring, and heartless,

the judge in Scott

Peterson's m*rder trial

sentenced him to death

for k*lling his wife,

Laci, and their unborn child.

This is a box of

letters and cards

that was sent to our family,

mostly from 2003 to 2004.

"You must be in so

much pain seeing

"your child going through this.

"Your grief has to

be beyond words.

"You have lost a

daughter-in-law and a grandson.

"And your son is

facing challenges

"like he has never known.

"I cannot even comprehend

the pain you have to bear.

"Hold on to each other

with all that you have.

Your strength will

pull you through."

"Dear Lee and Jackie,

"I realize that this

case did not involve

"just one family but two.

"I'm the mother of a

seven-year-old boy,

"and if I were in

your situation,

I would have stood by my

son, as you did yours."

Getting letters

like this really,

really did make the difference

and make us feel like

we weren't alone.

We we thought the whole

world thought Scott was guilty,

but even to fill up

just a few boxes of

letters at that time

really made a big difference.

"Tonight, my heart is

filled with deep sadness.

"After watching so long to see

Scott go home with his family,

"your son did not

get a fair trial,

and there is no city in

the USA where he could."

Not long after his conviction,

as the dust settled,

everyone started to realize,

this doesn't feel

like this is right.

This doesn't feel like it was

a powerful, compelling case.

[tense music]

There have always been

a lot of questions

about how, when, where, and why.

They were never answered

in the trial itself.

We depend upon the police

to turn over every stone

and to examine every clue.

If they don't do that,

if they disregard

every piece of evidence

that doesn't fit their theory,

then their conclusions

are gonna be tainted

and likely wrong.

The Modesto Police

Department were absolutely

laser-focused on Scott

because they thought he did it.

There are a slew of eyewitnesses

who saw Laci Peterson

walking her dog

in and around the neighborhood.

There's probably 12 to

13 people that never had

a face-to-face interview

with a detective

while Laci was missing.

I have forever been

bothered by the fact

that the jury didn't hear

about those witnesses.

I've always believed

that the burglary

had something to do with it.

I think the police

decided very early on

that Scott was guilty.

And I think because of it, they

didn't effectively investigate

the Medina burglary.

The prosecution

position was at the time

that the burglary didn't

even happen on the day

of Laci's disappearance.

If that burglary happened

when Laci was around

and still alive,

it could not have

been a coincidence.

I don't think the police looked

at the burglary enough

to understand the tie-ins

to Laci's disappearance.

There's so much

reasonable doubt,

we're still talking

about it now.

There are so many instances

where there is evidence

that didn't fit the

detective's theory.

They just assumed she was dead.

Well, what if they

talked to these people,

and they found out where she was

and they learned

information from them

which could have

brought her home?

Here we are 20 years later

trying to piece this together.

I don't know that we ever felt

like we could look up and

and see that light at

the end of the tunnel.

But to have the Los

Angeles Innocence Project

come on board and file motions

that are being

actively litigated,

I think it gives us great hope.

You know, the Los Angeles

Innocence Project believes

that there is a case here.

This isn't about one

side winning or losing.

This is about justice.

This is about the

fairness of a trial.

An innocent man has been

in jail for 20 years now.

And where is the

justice in that?

Somebody has to fight for him.

People have fought

for him for years.

And now we've got a new

group fighting for him.

[ominous music]