Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

50x08 - Hidden Volcano Abyss

Episode transcripts for the TV show, "Nova". Aired: March 3, 1974 – present.*
Watch/Buy Amazon


Nova often includes interviews with scientists doing research in the subject areas covered and occasionally includes footage of a particular discovery.

50x08 - Hidden Volcano Abyss

Post by bunniefuu »

♪ ♪

MILES O'BRIEN:
Machines that think like humans.

Our dream to create machines
in our own image

that are smart and intelligent

goes back to antiquity.

Well, can it bring it to me?

O'BRIEN: Is it possible that
the dream of artificial intelligence

has become reality?

They're able to do things

that we didn't
think they could do.

MANOLIS KELLIS: Go was thought to be
a game where machines would never win.

The number of choices
for every move is enormous.

O'BRIEN: And now, the
possibilities seem endless.

MUSTAFA SULEYMAN:
And this is going to be

one of the greatest boosts

to productivity in the
history of our species.

That looks like just a hint
of some type of smoke.

O'BRIEN: Identifying
problems before a human can...

LECIA SEQUIST: We
taught the model to recognize

developing lung cancer.

O'BRIEN: and
inventing new drugs.

PETRINA KAMYA: I never
thought that we would be able

to be doing the things
we're doing with A.I..

O'BRIEN: But
along with the hope...

[imitating Obama]:
This is a dangerous time.

O'BRIEN: comes deep concern.

One of the first drops
in the feared flood

of A.I.-created disinformation.

We have lowered barriers
to entry to manipulate reality.

We're going to live in a world
where we don't know what's real.

The risks are uncertain
and potentially enormous.

O'BRIEN: How powerful
is A.I.? How does it work?

And how can we reap
its extraordinary benefits...

Sybil looked here,

and anticipated that
there would be a problem.

O'BRIEN: without
jeopardizing our future?

"A.I. Revolution"

right now, on "NOVA!"

[whirring]

♪ ♪

Tell me the backstory
on inflection A.I..

[voiceover]: Our story begins
with the making of this story.

PI [on computer]: The story of
Inflection A.I. is an exciting one.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
I was researching

an interview subject.

Who is Mustafa Suleyman?

[voiceover]: Something I've done

a thousand times
in my 40-year career.

PI [on computer]: Mustafa
Suleyman is a true pioneer

in the field of
artificial intelligence.

[voiceover]: But this
time, it was different:

I wasn't typing
out search terms.

What is machine learning?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: I was having
a conversation with a computer.

PI: Sounds like an
exciting project, Miles.

[voiceover]: It felt like
something big had changed.

PI: Machine learning, ML, is
a type of artificial intelligence.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
And as it happened,

I was focused on one of the
innovators of this revolution.

Okay, so if I do this...

[voiceover]: Mustafa
Suleyman is Co-Founder

of a startup called Inflection.

It makes an artificial
intelligence assistant

called Pi.

So now you can speak...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: I
met them both in London.

It's fundamentally
different, isn't it?

Yeah, it's a
conversational style.

All of us humans
learn through stories,

and through narrative, and
through interactive dialogue.

And now, the machine
can kind of come alive,

and talk to you
about whatever it is

that's on top of your mind.

O'BRIEN: Tell me about
the PBS program "NOVA."

[voiceover]: Chatbots can offer
up quick answers, write poems,

finish essays, and
translate languages

among many other things.

PI [over phone]: "NOVA" is a
science documentary series...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
They aren't perfect,

but they have put artificial
intelligence in our hands,

and into the public
consciousness.

And it seems we're
equal parts leery

and intrigued.

SULEYMAN: A.I. is a tool

for helping us to understand
the world around us,

predict what's likely to
happen, and then invent

solutions that help
improve the world around us.

My motivation was
to try to use A.I. tools

to, uh, you know,
invent the future.

The rise in artificial
intelligence...

REPORTER: A.I.
technology is developing...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Lately, it
seems a dark future is already here...

The technology could
replace millions of jobs...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: if
you listen to the news reporting.

The moment civilization
was transformed.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: So how
can artificial intelligence help us,

and how might it hurt us?

At the center of the
public handwringing:

how should we put
guardrails around it?

We definitely need more
regulations in place...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Artificial
intelligence is moving fast

and changing the world.

Can we keep up?

Non-human minds
smarter than our own.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: The news
coverage may make it seem like

artificial intelligence
is something new.

At a moment of revolution...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: But human
beings have been thinking about this

for a very long time.

I have a very fine brain.

Our dream to create
machines in our own image

that are smart and intelligent
goes back to antiquity.

Uh, it's, it's
something that has,

has permeated the evolution
of society and of science.

[mortars firing]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: The modern
origins of artificial intelligence

can be traced back
to World w*r II,

and the prodigious
human brain of Alan Turing.

The legendary
British mathematician

developed a machine

capable of deciphering coded
messages from the Nazis.

After the w*r, he was among
the first to predict computers

might one day match
the human brain.

There are no surviving
recordings of Turing's voice,

but in 1951, he gave a
short lecture on BBC radio.

We asked an A.I.-generated
voice to read a passage.

TURING A.I. VOICE: I think
it is probable, for instance,

that at the end of the century,

it will be possible to
program a machine

to answer questions
in such a way

that it will be extremely
difficult to guess

whether the answers
are being given by a man

or by the machine.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: And
so, the Turing test was born.

Could anyone build a machine

that could converse
with a human in a way

that is indistinguishable
from another person?

In 1956,

a group of pioneering
scientists spent the summer

brainstorming at
Dartmouth College.

And they told the world
that they have coined

a new academic field of study.

They called it
artificial intelligence

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: For
decades, their aspirations remained

far ahead of the
capabilities of computers.

In 1978,

"NOVA" released its first
film on artificial intelligence.

We have seen the
first crude beginnings

of artificial intelligence...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: And the
legendary science fiction writer,

Arthur C. Clark was,
as always, prescient.

It doesn't really
exist yet at any level,

because our most complex
computers are still morons,

high-speed morons,
but still morons.

Nevertheless, we have
the possibility of machines

which can outpace
their creators,

and therefore, become
more intelligent than us.

At the time, researchers were
developing "expert systems,"

purpose-built to
perform specific tasks.

So the thing that we need to do

to make machine understand,
um, you know, our world,

is to put all our
knowledge into a machine

and then provide
it with some rules.

♪ ♪

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Classic A.I.
reached a pivotal moment in 1997

when an artificial intelligence
program devised by IBM,

called "Deep Blue" defeated
world chess champion

and grandmaster Garry Kasparov.

It searched about 200
million positions a second,

navigating through
a tree of possibilities

to determine the best move.

RUS: The program analyzed
the board configuration,

could project forward
millions of moves

to examine millions
of possibilities,

and then picked the best path.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Effective, but brittle,

Deep Blue wasn't
strategizing as a human does.

From the outset, artificial
intelligence researchers

imagined making machines

that think like us.

The human brain, with
more than 80 billion neurons,

learns not by following rules,

but rather by taking in
a steady stream of data,

and looking for patterns.

KELLIS: The way that
learning actually works

in the human brain is
by updating the weights

of the synaptic connections

that are underlying
this neural network.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Manolis Kellis
is a Professor of Computer Science

at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.

So we have trillions of
parameters in our brain

that we can adjust
based on experience.

I'm getting a reward.

I will update the strength
of the connections

that led to this reward...
I'm getting punished,

I will diminish the
strength of the connections

that led to the punishment.

So this is the original
neural network.

We did not invent it, we,
you know, we inherited it.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: But
could an artificial neural network

be made in our own
image? Turing imagined it.

But computers were nowhere near

powerful enough
to do it until recently.

It's only with the advent
of extraordinary data sets

that we have, uh,
since the early 2000s,

that we were able to
build up enough images,

enough annotations,

enough text to be
able to finally train

these sufficiently
powerful models.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: An
artificial neural network is, in fact,

modeled on the human brain.

It uses interconnected
nodes, or neurons,

that communicate
with each other.

Each node receives
inputs from other nodes

and processes those
inputs to produce outputs,

which are then passed
on to still other nodes.

It learns by adjusting the
strength of the connections

between the nodes based
on the data it is exposed to.

This process of
adjusting the connections

is called training,

and it allows an
artificial neural network

to recognize patterns and
learn from its experiences

like humans do.

A child, how is it
learning so fast?

It is learning so fast

because it's constantly
predicting the future

and then seeing what happens

and updating their weights
in their neural network

based on what just happened.

Now you can take this

self-supervised
learning paradigm

and apply it to machines.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: At first, some
of these artificial neural networks

were trained on vintage
Atari video games

like "Space Invaders"

and "Breakout."

Games reduce the
complexity of the real world

to a very narrow set of
actions that can be taken.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Before he started Inflection,

Mustafa Suleyman
co-founded a company called

DeepMind in 2010.

It was acquired by
Google four years later.

When an A.I. plays a game,

we show it
frame-by-frame, every pixel

in the moving image.

And so the A.I. learns
to associate pixels

with actions that it can take

moving left or right or
pressing the fire button.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: When it
obliterates blocks or shoots aliens,

the connections between the
nodes that enabled that success

are strengthened.

In other words, it is rewarded.

When it fails, no reward.

Eventually, all those
reinforced connections

overrule the weaker ones.

The program has
learned how to win.

This sort of repeated
allocation of reward

for repetitive behavior is
a great way to train a dog.

It's a great way to teach a kid.

It's a great way for us as
adults to adapt our behavior.

And in fact, it's
actually a good way

to train machine learning
algorithms to get better.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: In 2014, DeepMind
began work on an artificial neural network

called "AlphaGo"

that could play the ancient,

and deceptively complex,
board game of Go.

KELLIS: Go was thought to be a
game where machines would never win.

The number of choices
for every move is enormous.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
But at DeepMind,

they were counting on

the astounding growth
of compute power.

And I think that's the key
concept to try to grasp,

is that we are massively,
exponentially growing

the amount of computation
used, and in some sense,

that computation is a proxy

for how intelligent
the model is.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
AlphaGo was trained two ways.

First, it was fed a large
data set of expert Go games

so that it could learn
how to play the game.

This is known as
supervised learning.

Then the software played
against itself many millions of times,

so-called
reinforcement learning.

This gradually improved
its skills and strategies.

In March 2016,

AlphaGo faced Lee Sedol,

one of the world's
top-ranking players

in a five-game match
in Seoul, South Korea.

AlphaGo not only won,

but also made a move so
novel, the Go cognoscenti

thought it was a huge blunder.
That's a very surprising move.

There's no question to
me that these A.I. models

are creative.

They're incredibly creative.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It turns out
the move was a stroke of brilliance.

And this emergent
creative behavior

was a hint of what was to come:

generative A.I.

Meanwhile,

a company called
OpenA.I. was creating

a generative A.I. model

that would become ChatGPT.

It allows users to
engage in a dialogue

with a machine that
seems uncannily human.

It was first released in 2018,

but it was a subsequent version
that became a global sensation

in late 2022.

This promises to
be the viral sensation

that could completely
reset how we do things.

Cranking out entire essays

in a matter of seconds.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Not only
did it wow the public, it also caught

artificial intelligence
innovators off guard.

YOSHUA BENGIO:
It surprised me a lot

that they're able
to do things that

we didn't think they
could do simply by

learning to imitate
how humans respond.

And I thought this kind
of abilities would take

many more years or decades.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: ChatGPT
is a large language model.

LLMs start by consuming
massive amounts of text:

books, articles and websites,

which are publicly
available on the internet.

By recognizing patterns
in billions of words,

they can make guesses at
the next word in a sentence.

That's how ChatGPT
generates unique answers

to your questions.

If I ask for a haiku
about the blue sky

it writes something that
seems completely original.

KELLIS: If you're
good at predicting

this next word,

it means you're understanding
something about the sentence.

What the style
of the sentence is,

what the feeling
of the sentence is.

And you can't tell whether
this was a human or a machine.

That's basically the
definition of the Turing test.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: So,
how is this changing our world?

Well, It might change my
world... as an arm amputee.

Ready for my
casting call, right?

MONROE [chuckling]: Yes.

Let's do it. All right.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: That's
Brian Monroe of the Hanger Clinic.

He's been my prosthetist

since an injury took
my arm above the elbow

ten years ago.

So what we're going to do today
is take a mold of your arm. Uh-huh.

Kind of is like a cast
for a broken bone.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Up until now, I
have used a body-powered prosthetic.

Harness and a cable
allow me to move it

by shrugging my shoulders.

The technology is
more than a century old.

But artificial intelligence,

coupled with small
electric motors,

is finally pushing prosthetics
into the 21st century.

Which brings me to Chicago

and the offices of a small
company called Coapt.

I met the C.E.O., Blair Locke,

a pioneer in the push to
apply artificial intelligence

to artificial limbs.

So, what do we have here?
What are we going to do?

This allows us to very easily
test how your control would be

using a pretty simple cuff;
this has electrodes in it,

and we'll let the
power of the electronics

that are doing the
machine learning

see what you're capable
of. All right, let's give it a try.

[voiceover]: Like most amputees,

I feel my missing hand
almost as if it was still there...

a phantom.

Everything will
touch. Is that okay?

Yeah. Not too tight?

No. All good. Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It's almost
entirely immobile, stuck in molasses.

Make a fist, not too hard.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: But I am able
to imagine moving it ever so slightly.

And I'm gonna have you
squeeze into that a little bit harder.

Very good, and I see
the pattern on the screen

change a little bit.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
And when I do,

I generate an array of faint
electrical signals in my stump.

That's your muscle information.

It feels, it feels
like I'm overcoming

something that's really stuck.

I don't know, is
that enough signal?

Should be. Oh, okay.

We don't need a lot of signal,

we're going for information

in the signal,
not how loud it is.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: And this is
where artificial intelligence comes in.

Using a virtual prosthetic
depicted on a screen,

I trained a machine learning
algorithm to become fluent

in the language of my
nerves and muscles.

We see eight different
signals on the screen.

All eight of those sensor sites

are going to feed in together

and let the algorithm
sort out the data.

What you are experiencing

is your ability to
teach the system

what is hand-closed to you.

And that's different than
what it would be to me.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: I told the
software what motion I desired,

open, close, or rotate,

then imagined moving my
phantom limb accordingly.

This generates an array
of electromyographic,

or EMG, signals in
my remaining muscles.

I was training the A.I.
to connect the pattern

of these electrical signals
with a specific movement.

LOCK: The system adapts,

and as you add more
data and use it over time,

it becomes more robust,

and it learns to
improve upon use.

O'BRIEN: Is it me that's learning,
or the algorithm that's learning?

Or are we learning together?
LOCK: You're learning together.

Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: So, how does the
Coapt pattern recognition system work?

It's called a Bayesian
classification model.

As I train the software,

it labels my various
EMG patterns

into corresponding
classes of movement...

hand open, hand closed,
wrist rotation, for example.

As I use the arm,

it compares the electrical
signals I'm transmitting

to the existing library of
classifications I taught it.

It relies on
statistical probability

to choose the best match.

And this is just one
way machine learning

is quietly
revolutionizing medicine.

Computer scientist
Regina Barzilay

first started working
on artificial intelligence

in the 1990s, just as
rule-based A.I. like Deep Blue

was giving way
to neural networks.

She used the techniques

to decipher dead languages.

You might call it a
small language model.

Something that is fun and
intellectually very challenging,

but it's not like it's
going to change our life.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: And then
her life changed in an instant.

CONSTANCE LEHMAN:
We see a spot there.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: In 2014, she
was diagnosed with breast cancer.

BARZILAY [voiceover]: When
you go through the treatment,

there are a lot of
people who are suffering.

I was interested in

what I can do about it, and
clearly it was not continuing

deciphering dead languages,

and it was quite a journey.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Not surprisingly,
she began that journey with mammograms.

LEHMAN: It's a little
bit more prominent.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: She
and Constance Lehman,

a radiologist at Massachusetts
General Hospital,

realized the Achilles heel
in the diagnostic system

is the human eye.

BARZILAY [voiceover]: So
the question that we ask is,

what is the likelihood
of these patients

to develop cancer
within the next five years?

We, with our human eyes,

cannot really make
these assertions

because the
patterns are so subtle.

LEHMAN: Now, is that different
from the surrounding tissue?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It's a perfect
use case for pattern recognition

using what is known as a
convolutional neural network.

♪ ♪

Here's an example of
how CNNs get smart:

they comb through a picture with
many virtual magnifying glasses.

Each one is looking for a
specific kind of puzzle piece,

like an edge, a
shape, or a texture.

Then it makes
simplified versions,

repeating the process on
larger and larger sections.

Eventually the puzzle
can be assembled.

And it's time to make a guess.

Is it a cat? A dog? A tree?

Sometimes the guess is
right, but sometimes it's wrong.

And here's the learning part:

with a process called
backpropagation,

labeled images are sent back
to correct the previous operation.

So the next time it
plays the guessing game,

it will be even better.

To validate the model, Regina
and her team gathered up

more than 128,000 mammograms

collected at seven
sites in four countries.

More than 3,800 of them
led to a cancer diagnosis

within five years.

You just give to it the image,

and then the five
years of outcomes,

and it can learn the likelihood
of getting a cancer diagnosis.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: The
software, called Mirai, was a success.

In fact, it is between


in predicting future
cancer diagnoses.

Then, a friend of Regina's
developed lung cancer.

SEQUIST: In lung
cancer, it's actually

sort of mind boggling
how much has changed.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Her friend
saw oncologist Lecia Sequist.

She and Regina wondered

if artificial intelligence
could be applied

to CAT scans of patients' lungs.

SEQUIST: We taught the model

to recognize the patterns
of developing lung cancer

by using thousands of CAT scans

from patients who
were participating

in a clinical trial.

From the new study?
Oh, interesting. Correct.

SEQUIST [voiceover]: We had
a lot of information about them.

We had demographic information,

we had health information,

and we had outcomes information.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
They call the model Sibyl.

In the retrospective
study, right,

so the retrospective data...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Radiologist Florian Fintelmann

showed me what it can do.

FINTELMANN: This is
earlier, and this is later.

There is nothing

that I can perceive,
pick up, or describe.

There's no, what we
call, a precursor lesion

on this CT scan.

Sibyl looked here

and then anticipated that
there would be a problem

based on the baseline
scan. What is it seeing?

That's the million
dollar question.

And, and maybe not
the million dollar question.

Does it really matter? Does it?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: When
they compared the predictions

to actual outcomes from
previous cases, Sybil fared well.

It correctly forecast cancer

between 80% and 95% of the time,

depending on the
population it studied.

The technique is
still in the trial phase.

But once it is deployed,

it could provide a
potent tool for prevention.

The hope is that if you
can predict very early on

that the patient is
in the wrong way,

you can do clinical trials,
you can develop the drugs

that are doing the prevention,
rather than treatment

of very advanced disease
that we are doing today.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Which takes
us back to DeepMind and AlphaGo.

The fun and games
were just the beginning,

a means to an end.

We have always
set out at DeepMind

to, um, use our technologies
to make the world a better place.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: In 2021,

the company released AlphaFold.

It is pattern
recognition software

designed to make it
easier for researchers

to understand proteins,

long chains of amino acids

involved in nearly every
function in our bodies.

How a protein folds

into a specific,
three-dimensional shape

determines how it interacts
with other molecules.

SULEYMAN: There's
this correlation between

what the protein does
and how it's structured.

So if we can predict
how the protein folds,

then say something
about their function.

O'BRIEN: If we know how a
disease's protein is shaped, or folded,

we can sometimes
create a drug to disable it.

But the shape of millions of
proteins remained a mystery.

DeepMind trained AlphaFold

on thousands of
known protein structures.

It leveraged this
knowledge to predict



nearly all the proteins
known to science.

SULEYMAN: You take
some high-quality known data,

and you use that to, you know,

make a prediction about how
a similar piece of information

is likely to unfold
over some time series,

and the structure
of proteins is,

you know, in that
sense, no different to

making a prediction in
the game of Go or in Atari

or in a mammography scan,

or indeed, in a large
language model.

KAMYA: These thin sticks here?

Yeah? They represent
the amino acids

that make up a protein.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Theoretical chemist

Petrina Kamya works
for a company called

Insilico Medicine.

It uses AlphaFold

and its own deep-learning models

to make accurate predictions
about protein structures.

What we're doing in drug design
is we're designing a molecule

that is analogous to
the natural molecule

that binds to the protein,

but instead it will
lock it, if this molecule

is involved in a disease
where it's hyperactive.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
If the molecule fits well,

it can inhibit the
disease-causing proteins.

So you're filtering it down

like you're choosing an
Airbnb or something to,

you know, number of bedrooms,
whatever. To suit your needs.

[laughs] Exactly, right.

Right, yeah. That's
a very good analogy.

It's sort of like Airbnb.

So you are putting
in your criteria,

and then Airbnb will filter out

all the different properties

based on your criteria.

So you can be
very, very restrictive

or you can be very,
very free... Right.

In terms of guiding the
generative algorithms

and telling them what
types of molecules

you want them to generate.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It will take


to identify the best
candidates ranked in order.

How long would it have taken you

to figure that out as a
computational chemist?

I would have thought
of some of these,

but not all of them. Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: While there
are no shortcuts for human trials,

nor should we hope for that,

this could greatly speed up
the drug development pipeline.

There will not be the
need to invest so heavily

in preclinical discovery,

and so, drugs can
therefore be cheaper.

And you can go
after those diseases

that are otherwise neglected,

because you don't
have to invest so heavily

in order for you to
come up with a drug,

a viable drug.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: But
medicine isn't the only place

where A.I. is
breaking new frontiers.

It's conducting
financial analysis,

helps with fraud detection.

[mechanical whirring]

It's now being deployed
to discover novel materials

and could help us build
clean energy technology.

And It is even
helping to save lives

as the climate
crisis boils over.

[indistinct radio chatter]

In St. Helena, California,

dispatchers at the

CAL FIRE Sonoma-Lake-Napa
Command Center

caught a break in 2023.

Wildfires blackened nearly


We were at 400,000
acres in 2020.

Something like that would
generate a response from us...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Chief Mike
Marcucci has been fighting fires

for more than 30 years.

MARCUCCI [voiceover]: Once we
started having these devastating fires,

we needed more intel.

The need for intelligence

is just overwhelming
in today's fire service.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Over the past 20 years,

California has
installed a network

of more than 1,000
remotely operated

pan, tilt, zoom surveillance
cameras on mountaintops.

PETE AVANSINO: Vegetation
fire, Highway 29 at Doton Road.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: All those
cameras generate petabytes of video.

CAL FIRE partnered with
scientists at U.C. San Diego

to train a neural network

to spot the early
signs of trouble.

It's called ALERT California.

SeLEGUE: So here's
one that just popped up.

Here's an anomaly.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: CAL FIRE Staff Chief
of Fire and Intelligence Philip SeLegue

showed me how it works
while it was in action,

detecting nascent fires,

micro fires.

That looks like
just a little hint

of some type of
smoke that was there...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Based on
this, dispatchers can orchestrate

a fast response.

A.I. has given us the
ability to detect and to see

where those fires are starting.

AVANSINO: Transport


O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
For all they know,

they have nipped some
megafires in the bud.

The success are the fires

that you don't hear
about in the news.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Artificial intelligence

can't put out
wildfires just yet.

Human firefighters
still need to do that job.

But researchers are pushing hard

to combine neural networks

with mobility and dexterity.

This is where
people get nervous.

Will they take our jobs?

Or could they turn against us?

But at M.I.T.,

they're exploring
ideas to make robots

good human partners.

We are interested
in making machines

that help people with
physical and cognitive tasks.

So this is really great,

it has the stiffness
that we wanted...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Daniela Rus is
director of M.I.T.'s Computer Science

and Artificial Intelligence Lab.

Oh, can you bring it to me?

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: CSAIL.

They are different,
like, kind of like muscles

or actuators.

RUS [voiceover]: We
can do so much more

when we get people and
machines working together.

We can get better reach.

We can get lift,

precision, strength, vision.

All of these are
physical superpowers

we can get through machines.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
So, they're focusing

on making it safe for humans

to work in close
proximity to machines.

They're using some of
the technology that's inside

my prosthetic arm.

Electrodes that can read

the faint EMG signals generated

as our nerves command

our muscles to move.

They have the capability
to interact with a human,

to understand the human,

to step in and help
the human as needed.

I am at your disposal
with 187 other languages,

along with their various

dialects and sub tongues.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
But making robots as useful

as they are in the
movies is a big challenge.

♪ ♪

Most neural networks run
on powerful supercomputers...

thousands of processors
occupying entire buildings.

RUS: We have brains that require

massive computation,
which you cannot include

on a self-contained body.

We address the size challenge by

making liquid networks.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Liquid networks.

So it looks like an
autonomous vehicle

like I've seen before,

but it is a little
different, right?

ALEXANDER AMINI: Very different.

This is an autonomous vehicle

that can drive in
brand-new environments

that it has never seen
before for the first time.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Most
self-driving cars today rely,

to some extent, on
detailed databases

that help them recognize
their immediate environment.

Those robot cars get
lost in unfamiliar terrain.

O'BRIEN: In this case,
you're not relying on

a huge, expansive
neural network.

You're running on


Correct.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Computer
scientist Alexander Amini

took me on a ride in
an autonomous vehicle

with a liquid neural
network brain.

AMINI: We've become very
accustomed to relying on

big, giant data centers
and cloud compute.

But in an autonomous vehicle,

you cannot make such
assumptions, right?

You need to be able to operate,

even if you lose
internet connectivity

and you cannot talk
to the cloud anymore,

your entire neural network,

the brain of the car,
needs to live on the car,

and that imposes a lot
of interesting constraints.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: To
build a brain smart enough

and small enough to do this job,

they took some
inspiration from nature,

a lowly worm called C. elegans.

Its brain contains
all of 300 neurons,

but it's a very
different kind of neuron.

It can capture more
complex behaviors

in every single
piece of that puzzle.

And also the wiring,

how a neuron talks
to another neuron

is completely different
than what we see

in today's neural networks.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Autonomous
cars that tap into today's neural networks

require huge amounts of
compute power in the cloud.

But this car is using
just 19 liquid neurons.

A worm at the wheel... sort of.

AMINI [voiceover]:
Today's A.I. models

are really pushing
the boundaries

of the scale of
compute that we have.

They're also pushing
the boundaries

of the data sets that we have.

And that's not sustainable,

because ultimately,
we need to deploy A.I.

onto the device itself, right?

Onto the cars, onto
the surgical robots.

All of these edge devices

that actually makes
the decisions.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
The A.I. worm may, in fact,

turn.

The portability of
artificial intelligence

was on my mind when it came time

to pick up my new
myoelectric arm...

equipped with Coapt
A.I. pattern recognition.

All right, let's just check this

real quick...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
A few weeks after

my trip to Chicago,

I met Brian Monroe

at his home office
outside Washington, D.C.

Are you happy with the
way it came out? Yeah.

Would you tell me otherwise?

[laughing]: Yeah,
I would, yeah...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: As usual,

he did a great job
making a tight socket.

How's the socket
feel? Does it feel like

it's sliding down or

falling out... No,
it fits like a glove.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It's
really important in this case,

because the electrodes
designed to read the signals

from my muscles...

have to stay in place snugly

in order to generate
accurate, reliable commands

to the actuators in my new hand.

Wait, is that you? That's me.

[voiceover]: He
also provided me with

a human-like bionic hand.

But getting it
to work just right

took some time.

That's open and it's closing.

It's backwards?

Yeah. Now try.

If it's reversed,

I can swap the
electrodes. There we go.

That's got it. Is it
the right direction?

Yeah. Uh-huh. Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It's
a long way from the movies,

and I'm no Luke Skywalker.

But my new arm and
I are now together.

And I'm heartened to know

that I have the freedom
and independence

to teach and tweak it

on my own.

That's kind of cool. Yeah.

[voiceover]: Hopefully
we will listen to each other.

It's pretty awesome.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
But we might want to listen

with a skeptical ear.

JORDAN PEELE [imitating Obama]:
You see, I would never say these things,

at least not in a
public address,

but someone else would.

Someone like Jordan Peele.

This is a dangerous time.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It's even more
dangerous now than it was in 2018

when comedian Jordan Peele

combined his pitch-perfect
Obama impression

with A.I. software to make
this convincing fake video.

or whether we become
some kind of [bleep] up dystopia.

♪ ♪

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Fakes are about as old as

photography itself.

Mussolini, Hitler, and Stalin

all ordered that pictures
be doctored or redacted,

erasing those who
fell out of favor,

consolidating power,

manipulating their
followers through images.

HANY FARID: They've
always been manipulated,

throughout history, but...

there was literally, you
can count on one hand,

the number of people in
the world who could do this.

But now, you need
almost no skill.

And we said, "Give us an image

"of a middle-aged
woman, newscaster,

sitting at her desk,
reading the news."

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Hany Farid
is a professor of computer science

at U.C. Berkeley.

[on computer]: And this is
your daily dose of future flash.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
He and his team

are trying to navigate
the house of mirrors

that is the world of
A.I.-enabled deepfake imagery.

Not perfect.

She's not blinking,
but it's pretty good.

And by the way, he did
this in a day and a half.

FARID [voiceover]: It's
the classic automation story.

We have lowered
barriers to entry

to manipulate reality.

And when you do that,

more and more people will do it.

Some good people will do it,

but lots of bad
people will do it.

There'll be some
interesting use cases,

and there'll be a lot
of nefarious use cases.

Okay, so, um...

Glasses off. How's the framing?

Everything okay?

[voiceover]: About a week before

I got on a plane to
see him... Hold on.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: He
asked me to meet him on Zoom

so he could get a good recording

of my voice and mannerisms.

And I assume you're
recording, Miles.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: And he
turned the table on me a little bit,

asking me a lot of questions

to get a good sampling.

FARID [on computer]:
How are you feeling about

the role of A.I. as it
enters into our world

on a daily basis?

I think it's very
important, first of all,

to calibrate the concern level.

Let's take it away from
the "Terminator" scenario...

[voiceover]: The
"Terminator" scenario.

Come with me if
you want to live.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: You
know, a malevolent neural network

hellbent on
exterminating humanity.

You're really real.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
In the film series,

the cyborg assassin

is memorably played by
Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Hany thought it would be fun

to use A.I. to turn
Arnold into me.

Okay.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: A
week later, I showed up at

Berkeley's School
of Information,

ironically located in the
oldest building on campus.

So you had me do this
strange thing on Zoom.

Here I am. What
did you do with me?

Yeah, well, it's gonna teach you

to let me record your
Zoom call, isn't it?

I did this with
some trepidation.

[voiceover]: I was
excited to see what tricks

were up his sleeve.

FARID [voiceover]: I
uploaded 90 seconds of audio,

and I clicked a box saying

"Miles has given me
permission to use his voice,"

which I don't actually

think you did. [chuckles]

Um, and, I waited about,
eh, maybe 20 seconds,

and it said, "Okay, what
would you like for Miles to say?"

And I started typing,

and I generated an
audio of you saying

whatever I wanted you to say.

We are synthesizing,

at much, much lower resolution.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: You
could have knocked me over

with a feather
when I watched this.

A.I. O'BRIEN: Terminators
were science fiction back then,

but if you follow the
recent A.I. media coverage,

you might think that Terminators
are just around the corner.

The reality is...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: The eyes
and the mouth need some work,

but it sure does sound like me.

And consider what
happened in May of 2023.

Someone posted this
A.I.-generated image

of what appeared to
be a t*rror1st bombing

at the Pentagon.

NEWS ANCHOR: Today
we may have witnessed

one of the first drops
in the feared flood

of A.I.-created disinformation.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
It was shared on Twitter

via what seemed to be

a verified account
from Bloomberg News.

NEWS ANCHOR: It only
took seconds to spread fast.

The Dow now down
about 200 points...

Two minutes later, the
stock market dropped

a half a trillion dollars

from a single fake image.

Anybody could've
made that image,

whether it was intentionally
manipulating the market

or unintentionally,

in some ways, it
doesn't really matter.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: So
what are the technological

innovations that make
this tool widely available?

One technique is called

the generative
adversarial network,

or GAN.

Two algorithms

in a dizzying student-teacher
back and forth.

Let's say it's learning
how to generate a cat.

FARID: And it starts
by just splatting down

a bunch of pixels onto a canvas.

And it sends it over
to a discriminator.

And the discriminator has access

to millions and
millions of images

of the category that you want.

And it says,

"Nope, that doesn't look
like all these other things."

So it goes back to the
generator and says, "Try again."

Modifies some pixels,

sends it back to
the discriminator,

and they do this
in what's called

an adversarial loop.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
And eventually,

after many thousands of volleys,

the generator finally
serves up a cat.

And the discriminator says,

"Do more like that."

Today, we have a whole
new way of doing these things.

They're called diffusion-based.

What diffusion does

is it has vacuumed
up billions of images

with captions that
are descriptive.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: It starts
by making those labeled images

visually noisy on purpose.

FARID: And then it corrupts
it more, and it goes backwards

and corrupts it more,
and goes backwards

and corrupts it more
and goes backwards...

and it does that
six billion times.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Eventually it corrupts it

so it's unrecognizable
from the original image.

Now that it knows how to
turn an image into nothing,

it can reverse the process,

turning seemingly nothing,
into a beautiful image.

FARID: What it's
learned is how to take

a completely indescript
image, just pure noise,

and go back to a coherent
image, conditioned on a text prompt.

You're basically reverse
engineering an image

down to the pixel.

Yeah, exactly, yeah.

And it's... and by the
way... if you had asked me,

"Will this work?"
I would have said,

"No, there's no way
this system works."

It just, it just doesn't
seem like it should work.

And that's sort of the magic

of when you get this much data

and very powerful algorithms
and very powerful computing

to be able to crunch
these massive data sets.

I mean, we're not
going to contain it.

That's done.

[voiceover]: I sat
down with Hany

and two of his grad students:

Justin Norman and
Sarah Barrington.

We looked at some
the A.I. trickery

they have seen and made.

Somebody else
wrote some base code

and they got grew on to

and grow on to and grow
on to and eventually...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
In a world where anything

can be manipulated
with such ease

and seeming authenticity,

how are we to know
what's real anymore?

How you look at the world,

how you interact
with people in it,

and where you look for
your threats of that change.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Generative
A.I. is now part of a larger ecosystem

that is built on mistrust.

We're going to live
in a world where

we don't know what's real.

FARID [voiceover]: There
is distrust of governments,

there is distrust of media,

there is distrust of academics.

And now throw on top
of that video evidence.

So-called video evidence.

I think this is the
very definition

of throwing jet fuel
onto a dumpster fire.

And it's already happening,

and I imagine we
will see more of it.

[Arnold's voice]: Come
with me if you want to live.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
But it also can be

kind of fun.

As Hany promised,

here's my face

on the Terminator's body.

[g*nf*re blasting]

Long before A.I. might take

an existential turn
against humanity,

we will need to
reckon with the likes...

Go! Now! O'BRIEN
[voiceover]: Of the Milesinator.

TRAILER NARRATOR:
This time, he's back.

[booming]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Who will no doubt, be back.

Trust me.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: Trust,

but always verify.

So, what kind of A.I. magic

is readily available online?

It's pretty simple
to make it look

like you're fluent in
another language.

[speaking Mandarin]:

It was pretty easy to do,

I just had to upload
a video and wait.

[speaking German]:

And, suddenly, I
look pretty darn smart.

[speaking Greek]:

Sure, it's fun, but
I think you can see

where it leads to mischief

and possibly even mayhem.

[voiceover]: Yoshua Bengio is
an artificial intelligence pioneer.

He says he didn't
spend much time

thinking about
science fiction dystopia

as he was creating
the technology.

But as his brilliant
ideas became reality,

reality set in.

BENGIO: And the more I read,

the more I thought about it...

the more concerned I got.

If we are not honest
with ourselves,

we're gonna fool ourselves.

We're gonna... lose.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Avoiding that outcome

is now his main priority.

He has signed
several public warnings

issued by A.I. thought leaders,

including this stark
single-sentence statement

in May of 2023.

"Mitigating the risk
of extinction from A.I.

"should be a global priority

"alongside other
societal scale risks,

"such as pandemics

and nuclear w*r."

As we approach more and
more capable A.I. systems

that might even become stronger
than humans in many areas,

they become more
and more dangerous.

Can't we just pull
the plug on the thing?

Oh, that's the
safest thing to do,

pull the plug.

Before it gets so powerful that

it prevents us from
pulling the plug.

DAVE: Open the
pod bay doors, Hal.

HAL: I'm sorry, Dave,

I'm afraid I can't do that.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
It may be some time

before computers are able

to act like movie
supervillains...

HAL: Goodbye.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: But there are
near-term dangers already emerging.

Besides deepfakes
and misinformation,

A.I. can also supercharge
bias and hate content,

replace human jobs...

This is why we're striking,
everybody. [crowd exclaiming]

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
And make it easier

for t*rrorists to
create bioweapons.

And A.I. systems are so complex

that they are difficult
to comprehend,

all but impossible to audit.

RUS [voiceover]:
Nobody really understands

how those systems
reach their decisions.

So we have to be
much more thoughtful

about how we test
and evaluate them

before releasing them.

They're concerned
whether machine will be able

to begin to think for itself.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]: The U.S. and
Europe have begun charting a strategy

to try to ensure safe, secure,

and trustworthy
artificial intelligence.

RISHI SUNAK: in a way that
will be safe for our communities...

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
But how to do that

in the midst of a frenetic race

to dominate a technology

with a predicted economic impact

of 13 trillion dollars by 2030.

There is such a strong
commercial incentive

to develop this and
win the competition

against the other companies,

not to mention
the other countries,

that it's hard to
stop that train.

But that's what
governments should be doing.

NEWS ANCHOR: The
titans of social media

didn't want to
come to Capitol Hill.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
Historically, the tech industry

has bridled against regulation.

You have an army of
lawyers and lobbyists

that have fought us on this...

SULEYMAN [voiceover]:
There's no question that

guardrails will
slow things down,

But, the risks are uncertain

and potentially enormous.

So, it makes sense for us

to start having the
conversation right now.

O'BRIEN [voiceover]:
For me, the conversation

about A.I. is personal.

Okay, no network detected.

Okay, um...

Oh, here we go. Okay.

And now I'm going to open,
open, open, open, open...

[voiceover]: I
used the Coapt app

to train the A.I. inside
my new prosthetic.

♪ ♪

It says all of my
training data is good,

it's four of five stars.

And now let's try to close.

[whirring]

All right.

Seems to be doing
what it was told.

[voiceover]: Was
my new arm listening?

Maybe.

I decided to make
things simpler.

I took off the hand and
attached a myoelectric hook.

[quietly]: All right.

[voiceover]: Function over form.

Not a conversation piece
necessarily at a c*ck party

like this thing is.

This looks more like
Luke Skywalker, I suppose.

But this thing has a tremendous
amount of function to it.

Although, right now,
it wants to stay open.

[voiceover]: And that
problem persisted.

Find a tripod plate...

[voiceover]:
When I tried using it

to set up my basement studio

for a live broadcast.

Come on, close.

[voiceover]: I was
quickly frustrated.

[item drops, audio beep]

Really annoying.

Not useful.

[voiceover]: The hook
continuously opened on its own.

[clattering] Damn it!

[voiceover]: So I
completely reset

and retrained the arm.

And... reset, there we go.

Add data...

[voiceover]: But
the software was

artificially unhappy.

"Electrodes are not
making good skin contact."

Maybe that is my
problem, ultimately.

[voiceover]: My
problem really is

I haven't given
this enough time.

Amputees tell me it can take

many months to really learn

how to use an arm like this one.

The choke point isn't
artificial intelligence.

Dead as a doornail.

[voiceover]: But rather,
what is the best way

to communicate
my intentions to it?

Little reboot there, I guess.

All right.

Close.

Open, close.

[voiceover]: It turns
out machine learning

isn't smart enough to
give me a replacement arm

like Luke Skywalker got.

Nor is it capable of
creating the Terminator.

Right now, it seems
many hopes and fears

for artificial intelligence...

Oh!

[voiceover]: are
rooted in science fiction.

But we are walking down
a road to the unknown.

The door is opening
to a revolution.

[door closes]

♪ ♪

♪ ♪

♪ ♪

♪ ♪

♪ ♪

♪ ♪