Highly advanced humans
living thousands of years ago...
unidentified DNA in
the human genome...
and ancient chronicles
describing heavenly
interventions on Earth.
Did humans really
evolve from apes?
Or is our intelligence the result
of an otherworldly design?
What are humans made of?
Why do we evolve the way
we do, grow the way we do,
think the way we do?
There's no
explanation for human beings.
They shouldn't be
here on this planet.
Science
and the world of history,
even in archeology, is still
scrambling around for answers.
We should
finally come to grips with the
idea that extraterrestrials had
something to do
with our development.
Millions of people
around the world believe we have
been visited in the past by
extraterrestrial beings.
What if it were true?
Did ancient aliens really
help to shape our history?
And if so, might evidence of
alien contact help to unlock the
mystery behind
the creation of man?
South Africa
25 miles northwest of Johannesburg
lie the Malapa Caves.
Here, in August of 2008,
paleoanthropologist Lee Berger
and his nine-year-old son
Mathew discover several
fossilized skeletal remains
of two-million-year-old early
humans, including a female adult
and male child, perhaps a
mother and son.
The size and shape of the bones
indicate that the individuals
walked upright and
had modern hands.
Over the past several decades,
scientists have unearthed the
remains of nearly two dozen
different types of early human
ancestors, all known as hominids.
We have an
extremely good fossil record
of ancient hominids.
and I think the picture
emerging from it is
pretty clear that in earlier days,
before h*m* Sapiens came along
there were typically
many different kinds
of hominids coexisting
in the world.
We have a hard time giving
our minds around this
now because of course
there is just one kind
of human on earth today
and there are 7 billion of it
but at one time within the last
few hundred thousand years,
you could find two or even
three species of hominids
living the same area
at the same time.
Most mainstream
scholars tell us hominids
evolved from an ape ancestor
nearly six million years ago
through what is referred
to as natural selection.
This theory of evolution was
first popularized by English
anthropologist Charles Darwin in
his 1859 book
On the Origin of Species.
Darwin's mechanism
of evolution was natural selection.
That is to say a long-term
process whereby
better-adapted individuals
reproduce more successfully.
Darwin's theory of evolution
by natural selection explained
that organism with certain traits
such as mutation
turned out to be
actually beneficial
turned out to be of advantage in
the struggle for reproduction
So mutation allow
organism to survive and
to pass on to the next
generation this mutation.
Darwin speculated that over
time, hominids walking
on two feet used their
hands to make tools.
This, in turn,
made them smarter.
Then, approximately 200,000 years
ago, hominids evolved into
h*m* sapiens...
or modern man.
But many scholars dispute
Darwin's findings.
We don't see
dolphins building cars,
We don't see elephants
building houses.
That might sound trite, but it's
a fact that these animals just
simply haven't progressed and
advanced in the way we have.
And the big question is,
why is that?
Why should that happen?
Why should we be so unique?
Tool use doesn't
really come into play for
several million years after the
first earliest humans began to
walk upright.
And then brain size
doesn't really begin to
expand and really mushroom in
size until the last several
hundred thousand years.
So, actually six million years
of human evolution, there are
millions of years separating
each of those major features:
upright posture, tool
use, brain expansion.
So Darwin was wrong because he
couldn't possibly have known the
chronology in his day.
In 1967, British
zoologist Desmond Morris argued
against Darwin's theories
on evolution in his book
The Naked Ape.
In it, Morris wrote that there
was no reason why man stood
alone from other species
in terms of his nudity.
Well, of course,
as h*m* sapiens we still
continue to have a coating of
hair, but that hair is very
much reduced over most of our
bodies, and that reduction
probably goes back way
beyond h*m* sapiens in time.
It probably goes back to the
time when the very first early
bipedal hominids came out of
the forests in Africa into the
savannahs where they had more
sun and more thermal
radiation to cope with.
In places like Europe,
Northern Europe, why we
lost body hair is the
chicken and egg question.
Did we lose our body hair
because we began to wear
clothing to keep us warm or was
there some other factor at work
that caused us to
lose our body hair?
Perhaps women didn't find body
hair on men attractive, and so
it was lost because they didn't
choose those men as mates.
There's no way to ever
answer that question.
If we were to subscribe
100% to the idea of the
survival of the fittest
isn't it illogical to think
that all of a sudden
we're completely naked and
we're losing all of our fur?
I mean, that makes absolutely
no sense because right after we
shed our fur, we had to
wear furs to keep warm.
Had we not worn any furs, we
would have frozen to death,
we would have died.
So the whole idea that we shed
all of our hair in order to
survive because we were stronger,
logically makes no sense.
But if Darwin's
theory of natural selection
cannot account for the
appearance of intelligent
hairless h*m* sapiens,
what can?
Might the transition of hominids
to modern human beings have been
the result of an otherworldly
design, as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
Alfred Russel Wallace, a
colleague of Darwin, called it
the intelligence evolution.
Darwin believed
that the human brain had
been driven into existence by
natural selection, but Wallace
couldn't quite see how
this could be so.
What Wallace perceived was that
the way that humans think,
their intellectual faculties are
qualitatively different from
anything that had preceded them,
and he couldn't quite see how
this enormous gap could be
bridged by natural selection.
So he invoked another
explanation for the evolution,
the arrival of modern human
cognitive abilities.
His choice was a
spiritual explanation.
Alfred believed there was an unseen
creative spirit that was
behind all life on our planet.
And he believed that
this unseen creative spirit
had interceded three
times in this planet.
First was to create life
from inorganic matter.
And then the second time was
when animals achieved
some kind of consciousness.
And the third time was when
humans suddenly were able to
have the mental abilities
that we have today.
But he felt that it wasn't just
random selection like
Charles Darwin thought.
He believed that all of these
changes had a creative
intelligence behind it.
The view that I have
is that because the rest of
nature hasn't changed that much,
that arguably, we shouldn't.
So that suggests to me we're
seeing something potentially
that has gone against nature, and
if it's gone against nature,
maybe that means because somebody
has been manipulating nature.
There's no explanation
for human beings.
They shouldn't be
here on this planet.
If we were evolved and changed
by an extraterrestrial source
from our early primate ancestors
That's the only way, really,
you could've come
from the human species.
Unless you, of course,
put god into the equation.
Then, who knows who
the gods may have been.
Charles Darwin may be
crawling over in his grave right now
but it's very possible
that mankind came about
because of extraterrestrial
intervention.
Did the evolution
of modern humans
really received a jump start
by extraterrestrial beings,
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe
and if so, might there
be tangible evidence.
Some scientists believe
proof can be found,
inside the human brain.
Chicago, Illinois.
December 2004.
Researchers at the Howard
Hughes Medical lnstitute of the
University of Chicago publish
the results of a study that
claims the sophistication of the
human brain was the result of a
so-called special event.
They said mankind's intelligence
was not only the result of
evolution, and that around
50,000 years ago, the genes of
ancient humans went through an
intense amount of change in a
relatively short amount of time--
what some refer to as the
big bang of the brain.
No one really knows
how human beings developed so fast
in such a short period of time
They don't believe it
was done naturally.
It's very clear the fully
modern intellectual function
is a very recent acquisition
in our lineage.
It's not an improvement
of what was there before
it's a new kind of manipulation
of information and the mind.
There is no
other animal creature on the planet
that has such a comparative
point and that is why they call it
the big brain event.
People talk
about the missing link.
Where is between the link
between going from apes
monkeys, gorillas, ectetera,
to being out to develop atomic
weaponry and fly in space.
When we're looking
at the origins of man,
we've realised that 50,000 years
ago, we really went where
no creature has even gone before.
We have become human.
But what was the spark
that spored human intelligence
Was it a genetic mutation
brought about
by the natural selection
process of evolution
as many mainstream
scientists contend
or could've it been a
genetic modification
produced by
extraterrestrial beings
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
There's also the idea
that there was a gene or genes
that popped up some
time in our ancestors
randomly, that might
have given the ability
to symbolically represent
objects in our environment
or the abstract, those are
things that for instance
chimpanzees have a great
deal of trouble with
even with the talk language
h*m* Sapiens emerging from Africa
started to behave symbolically
They started to manipulate
information in their mind
in a way their predecessors
had never done before
They disassembled the world
around them into a vocabulary
of discrete symbols
and recombined them
so they could imagine
new kinds of worlds
Long long time ago,
extraterrestrials arrived
on this planet.
They realised that the
planet was full of life
and one of them was the
most advanced form
was one of our ancestors.
They took the DNA out
and they changed the
basic information in the DNA.
This is what our genetics
are doing every day.
Now, the cell was changed,
the product you plant into womb
of a female of the same species
This female will give birth to a child
approximately after 9 months
but because of this artificial
mutation, and that is the difference,
because it was made artificially
by the extraterrestrials.
What if as part
of the genetics updates
human beings were getting
from extraterrestrials
one of those genetic updates
involved a software download
biological download
to differentiate
the different hemispheres
of the brain
to allow human society, tool
making, fire, social organization
to be creative, and from that,
that particular species
of hominid became the
human being we are today.
If alien species out there could
fly across, interstellar space
then in all probability they
would have similar DNA
in common and technology.
Of course it would depend on
their own genetic composition
being similar to ours
but if they understood
sufficient chemistry
and physical principles
from their own experience
of their physical world model
then in all probability, manipulating
our DNA would be simple.
But if alien beings created
humans by genetically
altering our primitive ancestors,
might various versions
of hominids have been
the result of experiments at
creating intelligent life on Earth,
as ancient astronaut
theorists contend?
This is one of the greatest
unanswered questions.
The ancient records do not say
that we are part of a
social experiment.
The ancient records say that we
were bestowed upon this gift.
The gods gave us
the gift of intellect.
And it is for us to use it.
So yes, we might actually be
part of an experiment, but it
might be an experiment
in intelligence.
It might actually be a game,
a kind of the greatest reality TV
show, whereby the entire human
species is watched by ancient
aliens who have been watching
the show for maybe 50,000 years.
FOXP2 is a gene that was
found in our nuclear ***
and it is something that
sets us completely apart
from any other animal
And scientists have suggested
that that gene alone
is responsible for language
And there is absolutely
no evidence of origin
where as this thing
somehow mutated
from the animal kingdom
towards us.
So this gene exists out of
nowhere without any origin.
So my question is, is it
possible that this gene was
given to us, or grafted into us,
by extraterrestrials
in the remote past?
And the answer is yes.
Was it the same non
human ancient aliens
so many ancient settlements
on this planet
deciding that they
wanted humans to be able
to communicate at a more
sophisticated level
I think that's the fundamental
angst today among people trying
to understand who are we in
relationship to extraterrestrials
that may have been
manipulating DNA
on this planet for
thousands of years.
Might the evidence of
our alien origins really have
been passed down to us
implanted in our genetic code,
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
Perhaps further evidence can be
found, not by scientists, but
by religious scholars, that claim
Adam and Eve really did exist.
The Hebrew Bible.
In it, the Book of Genesis
describes how God created the
first two humans, Adam and Eve,
in the Garden of Eden and told
them to "go forth and multiply."
For centuries, scientists and
theologians have debated whether
this story of the Creation of Man
was mere myth or historical fact.
The Torah
mentions that humanity is made
out of the dust of the Earth,
and that God breathed life into
this to make us animated.
Here is the breath of soul,
the breath of vitality,
the divine breath that
suggests that with the spark
the life force that makes
a human body tick
it's divine in its nature
In 1987,
scholars disagreements
over the origin of man intensified
with the discovery that the genetic
lineage of every living person
could be traced back to a single
woman who once lived in Africa.
It's pretty well established by now
particularly from the
molecular, the DNA record
that h*m* sapiens did
originate at one place in Africa
and after having become fully modern
in the sense of intellectually modern
spread out to occupy Europe,
to occupy Eastern Asia
and the old world in general.
It is sometimes
called the Eve model
not meaning that we all descended
from the same woman
but it does mean that
there was a woman
in that early population
migrating out of Africa
who was the only female,
who ultimately left her genes
in every modern person.
But is it possible that
mainstream science
and the book of Genesis are
both pointing to the same
moment in ancient time when modern
man first appeared on Earth.
The myth of Adam and
Eve, I think, it's not a myth
I think it's a true story
I think Adam and Eve
were on this planet
they were the first human
beings that we know of
and they helped populate this planet
What is the Garden of Eden?
I think it just happened
to be the area
that the genetically manipulated
human beings, Adam and Eve,
were placed.
That's where they lived that's
where they started to breathe
and that's where the population's
planet started to grow
If Adam and Eve
actually had existed
as described in the Hebrew Bible,
might this also mean
that a serpent really did
tempt them to eat from
the tree of knowledge
and if so, might this account
have been an effort to describe
the sudden awakening of
the modern human mind,
when man first became
an intelligent being.
In the Bible says that if
you eat from this tree
you will be like god.
Satan in a form of a snake
tempted Adam and Eve
and promises them
that they will be like god
The knowledge that
Adam and Eve acquire
as well as humanity in general
gives man the ability to eventually
carry out genetic manipulations
So what was
this tree of knowledge?
Is the tree of knowledge
in fact a helical DNA sequencing
in our own bodies that
was genetically engineered
by extraterrestrials
50,000 years ago?
So that we would have the
abilities that we have today?
In my mind, it's our DNA itself
that is the Tree of Knowledge.
But why was this
suddenly a bad thing?
It would seem that the aliens...
some of them wanted us to have
this knowledge, to be like the
gods, but others said no, no.
Man is not to have all
of this knowledge.
This is also the same story of
the Greek god Prometheus, who,
against the orders of the other
gods, comes down to Earth and
gives mankind the
knowledge of fire.
But because of this gift to
mankind, he himself, as a god,
is, like Satan, he's
banished from the Earth.
And why?
Because he helped mankind to
have greater knowledge.
The whole idea
or concept of Satan
is based on a misunderstood
visit by extraterrestrials
in the remote past.
According to the ancient
astronaut theory,
the reason why we have
the idea of a Satan today
is because there might have
been some type of a mutiny
between good and bad
extraterrestrial factions
in the remote past.
And so the mutineers were cast
out by the commander and they
became known as
the evil fallen angels,
which they never were.
If as astronaut
theorists believe,
extraterrestrials were
responsible for providing humans
with intelligence, might they
have also given man
the ability to speak?
Our voice box, our larynx
is so different than the apes
even the chimpanzee who's
our closest cousin
that we are able to produce
sounds and produce language.
To a scientist today, that's almost like
it was genetically designed
so that we can
say words and sing
There really isn't anything more
advanced than the human language
So many different cultures, dialects,
languages around the world
and the very fact we can communicate
on such a *** extensive level
that really sets us apart
from all other animals.
Who invented language?
Where did that come from?
Was it something instilled in us?
I think there is a mystery to it,
that to a large degree science
and the world of history,
even archeology are still
scrambling around for answers
Maybe we shouldn't be looking
down here for answers
maybe we should
be looking up there.
We are told in the bible
that we are made into the image
of God What does that mean?
Does it mean that we were made
physically in somebody's image?
And so as for the question namely
whether we are
descendants from apes
or some other creatures
on this planet
or whether we have
been truly engineered
can be answered by mythology.
Mythology is able to say that we
are not descending from the ape,
but that something happened
on this Earth and an alien
intervention came and we
were the end result of this.
In my opinion
the extraterrestrials,
by an artificial mutation
they created the
intelligence of human
Then the extraterrestrial disappeared.
And some of our ancestors had
again sex with their ancestors,
with ape-like beings.
And that was called into
mythology, "original sin."
Then they return again, the gods,
they realized what happened...
and they decided to destroy the
whole race by a great flood,
and to restart the experiment
again with what we call
in mythology, Noah.
That's all text.
That's the way it is.
It would appear that
extraterrestrials came
here, used great apes, other
early hominids, created what
would be Neanderthal man, or
h*m* erectus, somebody similar
to us, and then refined that
hominid until they came up with
h*m* sapiens...
and then the other early
hominids were destroyed.
Might the biblical account
of Adam and Eve and
Noah's Ark really be the retelling
of extraterrestrial events,
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
Perhaps further evidence can
be found in the archeological
remnants and eyewitness
accounts from man's earliest
known civilization.
Northern Iraq
Along the east bank of the
Tigris River, opposite the city
of Mosul, lie the ruins of
the ancient city of Nineveh,
a place originally inhabited
by the Sumerians of Mesopotamia.
Here, in 1842, British archaeologist
Austen Henry Layard
unearthed the ruins of
the great library of
Assurbanipal, a royal archive
containing thousands of clay
tablets with cuneiform inscriptions.
Dating to 3000 BC, the messages
carved into stone are considered
to be the world's first
written accounts.
Sumerian tablets are
probably one of the oldest
form of written record that we have.
They've been translated and
tell exciting stories about how
Gods intervene with human beings
and actually had a hand in
the creation of human beings.
Whether or not it's just
mythology, or if it's fact
no one really knows.
According to interpretations
of the sumerian tablets,
the gods were called
the Annunaki.
What we are looking at here,
is a sumerian tablet that
actually shows the tree of life.
linked by divine beings, you can
see here the Annunaki on each side
We also see the winged disc, a
symbolic reference that the
Anunnaki had the power of flight.
They actually had necklaces
with astronomical references--
a moon, a star, various symbols,
which even could be symbolized
as a wristwatch-- technology
being used 6,000 years ago.
The written accounts etched into stone
suggest the Annunaki were
giant beings, standing eight
feet tall, who came to Earth
in search of gold for
their home planet.
When the Sumerian gods,
the Anunnaki, realized the
toll it was taking to mine the
gold themselves, they decided
to fashion a worker being, a
sl*ve to mine the gold for them.
And they explain in the Sumerian
creation tales that this was an
arduous process.
So it's very possible that our
genetic evolution was a process
done by the Anunnaki to
create us in their image and
after their likeness.
They created man according
to the sumerian texts.
They created Adam and Eve.
How interesting that the
Bible will echo the story
but talked about it in terms of God.
So much like these highly
advanced creatures
we're acting as teachers.
And certainly sumerian culture
and mythology is full of stories of,
you know, we're saving visitation
from these mysterious higher entities
that you know bestowed wisdom
and fantastic ideas and concepts.
And, you know, you have to
wonder-- is this just down to
myth, or was somebody coming
down and really trying to give
us a push, if you like?
Ancient chronicles of sky
beings creating human
life are common in early cultures
found all over the world.
But while mainstream scholars
often dismiss this evidence,
might such tangible historical
accounts provide proof of alien
intervention in man's evolution,
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
The Sumerians are
not the only culture
that talks about this.
Also in the Koran, it says that
language was given to us by
Allah, or God.
The Maya Popol Vuh says that
language was given
to us by the gods.
The ancient Egyptian texts are
saying the exact same thing.
It doesn't matter what ancient
culture we look at, they all say
the same, that language
was a gift from the gods.
We should finally come
to grips with the idea
that extraterrestrials had something
to do with our development.
Prior to the use of
early systems of writing,
ancient people carved symbolic
communication into stone.
Called petroglyphs, the oldest
date to about 10,000 to
12,000 years ago.
According to ancient astronaut
theorists, petroglyphs located
in the American Southwest link
the prehistoric ancestors of the
Zuni and Hopi tribes
with star beings.
The first graphic expressions
by humans were petroglyphs.
That means symbols or figures
scratched into stone.
The Hopi Indians, for example,
scratched petroglyphs into their
rock faces that show people with
radiating wreaths, gods that
descend from the sky.
The Hopi Indians say that
these beings are Kachinas--
beings from space who came to
Earth in aircraft, who were not
gods, but who brought them
knowledge from another planet.
We have the same phenomenon
in Europe, in Valcamonica.
We have it in Asia.
We have it in Brazil.
When we look at the
fact that all around the world
we hear similar legends of
people from the stars coming
down and having a profound
impact on the people of this
country or that particular
culture, all embroiled in
similar time frames, you
know, we're seeing a pattern
developing, and it's difficult to dismiss
that that pattern is suggestive.
In our ancient past, creatures
came down, interacted with us,
and maybe manipulated us to
become the people we are today.
Why are so many past
civilizations all saying similar things?
I think the simple answer is,
is that the same thing happened
and they know the story.
And the story is that
extraterrestrials came to this
planet, genetically made and
manipulated whatever creatures
were here at the time, and
helped jump-start society.
The bottom line is every
civilization talks about
the existence of man through the
eyes of a god, and if you think
of the eyes of the god as
ETs, it all makes sense.
Back then, this was the
way they communicated events
that were significant to them.
And so when we have this imagery
of the so-called star people on
petroglyphs and things like that,
they're clearly chronicling
something real,
to my mind at least, that
occurred in their history.
The big question is, what?
But while the evidence
of contact between
alien beings and early humans is
compelling, what if life did not
begin here on Earth, but
arrived from somewhere else?
Huntsville, Alabama.
NASA's Marshall
Space Flight Center.
Here, in March of 2011,
astrobiologist Richard Hoover
reports the extraordinary news
that he found micro fossil
organisms-- or ancient
bacteria-- inside rare
meteorites that are more than
four billion years old, dating
back to the birth
of our solar system.
Until recently, scientists did
not believe life could survive
the rigors of space travel.
But Hoover's finding suggests that
live bacteria made it to Earth
and may have even taken root here.
Microorganism trapped
inside the comets
can survive the travel
through interplanetary space
and interstellar space.
And the reason is that the
microorganism are trapped
in the rocky core.
Around, you have a thick
shield of icy material.
And on top, you have a
stratification of dust.
Dust is highly effective in
shielding the microorganism
from ultraviolet light.
So comet are an excellent
vehicle to transport
microorganism, single-cell life,
amino acid in the
vastness of space.
Instead of aliens
coming to the earth in UFOs
in classic Hollywood terms
a microbial phase of life comes
to the earth in a meteorite
survives entering
our atmosphere
crashes on the planet
and begins to thrive.
The theory that life on
Earth began with alien
organisms landing here from
other parts of the
universe is controversial.
Called panspermia, one of the
most vocal proponents of this
theory was Sir Francis Crick,
a British scientist who
co-discovered DNA in 1953.
Francis Crick co-discovered
of the double helix himself.
Said that all this
can't happen by chance
that it has to have
been engineered.
One of his arguments is that the
rotation of the DNA is in the
same direction
for all living things.
Had DNA developed on Earth, it
would probably have had a 50-50
distribution, and that's exactly
what we don't have.
One of the reasons why I think
the theory of panspermia
is so incredible
is that it tells you that there
is life throughout the universe.
If panspermia is correct, life
came here on comets or meteorites,
and we're being seeded,
not only on this planet,
but other planets as well.
And it could be part
of the great design.
It is the intentional
deliberate colonization
of other planets, other worlds
by an intelligent race of beings
using not flying saucers landing
in the desert somewhere
or in the middle of the sea
but the best way
to colonize a planet
you colonize it with your own DNA
and let the DNA sprout
into your own species
In terms of our science
and technology today,
we have the ability to extract
cells and DNA at a genetic level
and save them.
That's how we have so-called
test tube babies for couples
who can't have babies.
We preserve the materials
for when they need it.
And the day may well come when
we send into outer space the
equivalent of, like, Noah's Ark,
but instead of sending literal
animals, we send their essence--
their DNA, their genetic makeup.
I don't rule out the idea that
we could seed a whole new world.
Today, scientists know
that only about five
percent of the DNA contained in
our genes is used to
reproduce human beings.
The remainder is an
undecipherable code, once
referred to as junk DNA.
But is it really possible that so
much of our DNA is unnecessary?
Or might the majority of our DNA
be decoded sometime in the future?
And when it is, what might our
DNA reveal about the
origin of modern man?
Just because
we cannot decipher
95% of our genetic material
doesn't necessarily mean
that that 95% is
in fact useless.
Nature is extremely efficient.
DNA is the most powerful storage
device in the universe.
Not even with all the
supercomputers combined in the
world could we store as much
information as we
could store on DNA.
So I'm suggesting that
the ultimate proof of
extraterrestrial life will not
be found in a crashed spaceship
or in a text, but it will be
found within our own genes.
We have so much to
learn from studying our own DNA.
We are only just now beginning
to decode the human DNA sequence
And as we do that, what
we may discover is that
extraterrestrial DNA is built
into our own genetics.
Whatever is out there
created the universe, this
planet, and other planets and life.
And I strongly believe that this
tie-in with whether gods and ETs
were one of the same might
very well be the case.
It does not take away from the
fact that there's a god, that
there's a higher power, that
there's some creation out there
that made the ETs, but I think
that layer between God and man
is right in the middle, and
that's extraterrestrials
from other planets.
We have to learn that
most of our *** religions
Rome, except one thing
there is creation
there is what we call god
in all respect
And we have to learn by religion
we are very teeny, little beings
in this gigantic universe and
why God is absolutely
inexpressible.
It's so gigantic.
It's so wonderful.
So we would never lose God when
we continue to think
of extraterrestrials.
God becomes bigger.
Is it really possible
that humans evolved
from bacteria growing in some
sort of primordial ooze?
Or were we intelligently
designed by a higher power--
of extraterrestrial origin--
as ancient astronaut
theorists believe?
Perhaps the answer lies within
the very essence of what
makes us, human.
And with this knowledge, we may
yet discover our rightful
place in the universe.
03x16 - Aliens and the Creation of Man
Watch/Buy Amazon Merchandise
Explores the pseudoscientific hypothesis of ancient astronauts in a non-critical, documentary format.
Explores the pseudoscientific hypothesis of ancient astronauts in a non-critical, documentary format.