Welcome to our World! Where we serve you cookies to ensure you get the best viewing experience on our site.

Did you know that you can remove censorship board-wide, use our advanced search functions, be notified when new content is posted, join our memberships, set episodes to show in any order you want & more if you are logged into your account?

Register or sign in here: ucp.php?mode=register

01x04 - Human

Episode transcripts for the TV show, "A Brief History of the Future". Aired: April 3, 2024.*
Watch/Buy Amazon


Series takes viewers on a global journey to meet with scientists, entrepreneurs, and visionaries who are shaping the world of tomorrow.

01x04 - Human

Post by bunniefuu »

What I find

so fascinating about being human

is that every generation

kind of starts from zero.

Almost every other animal

can pretty much

stand up within a few seconds,

and they can kind of

make it on their own.

We can't.

So to be human means from

the very first several seconds

to be dependent

and to be in relationship

with other humans

for not just our basic needs

but all of our needs.

To be human means to be

in a social context.

It means to be

in relationship with others,

in relationship with yourself.

But our world

as it's built right now

doesn't drive us towards that.

If anything, it actually

drives us further apart.

We set up offices with cubes

where people

actually don't see each other.

We have

these single-family homes.

And then we take our youth

and we send them

for most of the day

to one building.

And then we take our

grandparents and our seniors,

and we send them off

to another building.

While we know what led to kind

of flourishing and happiness

for tens of thousands of years,

in many ways,

we're doing the exact opposite.

At the end of the day,

we are now realizing that

this hardware that

is the human,

kind of, biological being

is now operating in

an environment, in a context,

both in terms of politics,

in terms of technology,

just in terms of

the pace of the world

that it just wasn't made for.

And we're starting

to actually step back and say,

"Is this actually the way

I want to be human?"

The modern moment

we're living in

and the rapidly changing world

around us

is forcing us to ask

some new and needed questions

about what it means to be human.

As my journey continues,

I've been thinking a lot

about the role of h*m* sapiens

right now

and in the years to come.

How is technology changing us?

Can we evolve past

our worst tendencies?

And is there something sacred

about who we are

that goes beyond

just what we can achieve?

These questions have

big implications

for the kind of futures

we choose to create,

so today I've come to spend

time with a group of people

living together in

a retirement community

to hear a perspective

that only age can provide.

So I just want to start off

by just asking anyone,

What does it mean to be human

at this moment in time?

In this day

and age where we live,

in a 55 & older community,

we are being human,

because we take care

of one another.

We look out

for one another.

For me, I think being human

is knowing that I'm imperfect

and that the people

around me are imperfect,

and that I don't have to look

for perfection in others.

From a spiritual point of view,

being a human is to learn

a lesson in this world.

Because we are now

in a physical form

and because a spirit

could be reincarnated.

So here, I am learning

everything that I can.

We want to be heard.

We want to be seen.

We want to be loved.

We want to find someone

that can really--

we can connect with, that can

bring that true happiness

to life for us.

Being human is

a lot of things to me.

When I was younger,

as someone else pointed out,

it was different.

It was moving forward in this

very tunnel vision of life--

raising children, doing a job,

doing everything else.

I'm able to take

that experience, though,

and share it with grandchildren

that I have

that are in their 20s and 30s,

and saying, These are the things

to look forward to me.

So being human means being

compassionate, having empathy.

How would you have answered

that several decades ago?

I think in the past,

it was all about sacrifice.

You sacrificed for your

children.

You sacrificed

part of your own self

to build worth so that you can

have freedom later on in life.

I also think

that years ago as a young mother

and homemaker,

my focuses were so narrow.

It was home. It was work.

It was children.

And now today,

my focus is so widened.

It's like a freedom.

I think about my spirituality

and how I can broaden that,

what I can teach someone else,

particularly my grandchildren

and young people,

and it's joyous.

A decade ago, it was a blur.

Mm-hmm.

It was just too fast.

There was no time to reflect.

Now there is.

Mm-hmm.

So what we know

about the conditions

that lead us either to our

best or worst as human beings

really is situational.

Humans at their best,

humans at their

most kind of benevolent,

have been humans that have

been in a set of conditions

where they have felt cared for,

where they have felt safe,

and where they have had

a sense of security

not just about the present

moment but what is to come.

Now, that's obviously gonna beg

the question about right now,

because in this kind of

crossroads moment that we're in,

a lot of us don't feel safe.

We don't feel secure,

whether it's climate change,

racial injustice,

or the headlines

around what artificial

intelligence is doing,

coming for our jobs.

We're kind of

moving into a fear stance.

What I think

we're struggling with right now

is trying to retrieve

what it means to be human

in a digital age.

We know something's wrong.

The story

you're going to see and hear

is about science.

It is also a story about you.

One interesting

question to ask right now--

What does it mean to be human?

And I think it's good

to ask that question

because what it meant

to be human

may be different going forward.

Back when

I was a little hacker kid,

there was something

we called an exploit.

And that was,

when you were hacking,

you would find an exploit

in the computer

so that you could

get in there and, like,

control the thermostat

at the mall, right,

or change your grades in school.

What we're doing now is

telling our computers

and digital technologies

and AIs and algorithms

to find exploits in us--

exploits in our psychology,

exploits in our

emotional fabric,

exploits in our neurology--

and to mine them

for whatever purposes

they deem are important to them.

So when we are living

in a landscape

increasingly populated by

entities that are trying to

exploit us, to destabilize us,

to decalibrate our neurology

and psychology,

we are going to end up

emotionally unstable

and cognitively compromised.

There are startups.

There are established companies

that are working very hard

right now to bring machines

and humans together in new ways.

We have tools

that could transform humanity.

And we need to really

think through

how we're gonna deploy them.

These new tools

are fascinating

and full of incredible potential

to improve our lives,

but they also raise

all sorts of questions

about the impacts

and unintended consequences

they will bring.

What does it mean

to add on to our biology?

And what are the implications

to who and what we are?

I've come

to Cambridge University,

where an augmentation designer

named Dani Clode

is working on a project

called the Third Thumb,

a 3-D-printed hand extension

controlled by the feet,

exploring the impacts

of body-connected technology.

So this is my thumb.

So this is controlled

with my toes.

So there's pressure sensors

underneath my big toes.

And I'm controlling

the two degrees of freedom.

It seems kind of bizarre

to be controlling

something on my hand

with my toes,

but there's also

so many products that--

already utilize this

really strong connection

between our

upper and lower limbs.

And often

it's to extend the task

that our hands are doing.

Driving is the main one.

Instruments, sewing machines.

It's very frequent that

we'll kind of, you know,

lean on the toes to extend

the function of the hands.

It does freak me out

a little bit.

Yeah, does it?

It's a normal first response.

Is it? Is it? I mean,

what is that coming--

like, deep down, what is it

that folks are responding to

when they see--it's

one thing to talk about

something like this

theoretically.

It's another thing to be

talking to another human

with six fingers.

It's really important

that I find that line

and don't try

to cross it too much

in terms of the weirdness.

Because I want it

to be accepted.

You know, I want it to be

something that

people are intrigued

about trying on.

Hesitant but intrigued

is my sweet spot,

and so not scared.

So, yeah.

So this is what is going

underneath your foot.

The main control is

the dominant kind of

flexion control.

And it sits just

on your palm there.

So we usually do--

so the dominant movement,

which is flexion/extension

of our thumb.

So this is flexion, extension

and adduction and abduction.

So that's where the 2 degrees

of freedom of the thumb

that I focus on.

I want to see if I can--

Yeah. You're doing good for

your first kind of minute.

What you probably notice

is that straight away,

it's quite easy to do

the big, full movements

Yeah.

really quickly.

And then it's, what you start

to learn across the week,

if you were a participant,

is there's really smaller,

finer motor movements.

And that's when kind of

calibrating the sensors

to your feet and stuff

would really help.

It's already changing

the way that you

are considering

approaching an object.

Yeah. There we go.

Have to keep

the pressure on it.

Yeah.

I mean, but just--I mean,

look, I'm a minute into it.

But then the ability to--

Yeah.

There we go.

I'm not as scared

anymore.

I'm so glad.

Wallach, voice-over: Dani's

project is designed to be

a fun and thought-provoking

experience,

but it sits inside of

a rapidly-accelerating new field

known as human augmentation,

where designers around the world

are working on ways

to increase and expand

our bodies' natural capacities.

And as simple as it seems

to play with a third thumb,

what she is really doing

is using this as a way

to learn about

how our brains respond

to tools outside

our biological bodies.

How does this change

the definition of human?

Because when we often

think of the term human

Yeah.

we think of

the very kind of classic

h*m* sapiens hardware set.

But you're talking about

something

dramatically different.

Yeah.

How will that change

how we think about

what it means to be human?

I mean, I think we're

already playing around

with what it means

to be human.

We're adapting

ourselves already

so much technologically,

you know?

And even something as,

like, simple and complex

as memory with our phones,

you know,

we're already changing

the way, you know,

we utilize our memory.

I don't know if you can

remember phone numbers,

but I used to remember

all my best friends'

phone numbers.

And now, I can barely

remember my own.

We're already shifting

ourselves so much.

And so when you start

to kind of change the way

we embody this technology

that's implanted

or removable or wearable,

the human is gonna not

stop at the skin level.

What we're talking about

isn't slowing down.

It's just speeding up.

What are the questions

that you're asking yourself

about where this might go,

where this should go,

where this could go?

I'm so excited for how much

it's gonna help people,

but we also just have to--

I feel like we just have

to move at this equal pace

of questioning it

constantly.

And I feel like a lot of

people that

are developing

this kind of technology

aren't really

truly thinking

about the impact

on our biological selves.

Because it's

technology, right?

So we just kind of like,

go, go, go, go, go

as fast as possible.

And make it efficient,

make it--you know.

And where ability is even

not included as much,

let's just make it work.

And then we'll work out

everything else later.

And so we really just need

to be cautious of that.

Wallach, voice-over:

What's striking about this field

is how little is currently known

about

how our brains will respond

to these new tools.

And that's what

Dani is calling for,

a lot more study into

the effects and consequences

as new products and designs

continue to roll out.

While I was there,

she let me take part

in an MRI-based study

designed to measure

the brain's response

to this kind of augmentation,

as participants

follow simple prompts

to move the third thumb,

generating valuable data

that she and her team

can analyze.

We're just about to start,

yeah? You ready?

I'm ready.

Just touch the fingers,

so your thumb

and the other fingers together.

Like one, yeah. OK?

Yeah. I can already see that.

OK. We stop now.

This is amazing,

because it's my brain.

It is your brain.

What is it that

you're curious about?

Well,

we want to see the impact that

potentially that

upper limb augmentation

is having on your brain.

And we have to do MRI

to really investigate that.

In many ways,

what took hundreds of

thousands of years

or maybe even millions

of years of evolution

to give us these, you know,

10 fingers and 10 toes,

you're now doing in a matter

of a couple of years.

Yeah, I mean,

we're not sure

what a couple of years

using augmentation devices

would do to the brain.

At the moment, we're running

a seven-day training study,

which is already

a lot of data collection.

So, yeah.

I mean, but this is technology

that could potentially

be used for years.

We need to see the impact

that it's having on the brain

to try and investigate

what's changing.

Wallach, voice-over:

The research Dani is doing

is fascinating and feels

more important than ever

as we look ahead.

Augmentation is only

the tip of the spear

in terms of

the scientific transformation

we are in the midst of.

Beyond simply adding on to life,

the rapidly-expanding field

of synthetic biology

is actually editing

the very building blocks of life

itself.

I like to think

about synthetic biology

as a general purpose technology.

This is a technology that,

over time, has

the ability to generate value,

create new types of jobs,

and basically become

a invisible part of society.

Other general purpose

technologies--the steam engine.

The internet completely

transformed society.

Synthetic biology is a new

general purpose technology

that will impact

just about every industry

everywhere on the planet,

whether that's coming up

with a self-healing paint

for your car,

so if your car gets scratched,

you know,

that the paint heals itself,

or a new type of antibiotic.

What if there was a leaf

that was able

to suck more CO2

out of the atmosphere?

What would it mean

for a computer

that combines human brain cells

and the computer chip?

There are reasons that

we want to edit, to enhance,

but we also have to

think through

the sort of knock-on effects,

the unintended consequences

of that enhancement.

Wallach, voice-over: As human

and nonhuman technology

continues to speed up,

it raises both new

and very old questions about

who and what we are as people.

Why do we feel so disconnected

from ourselves, from each other,

and from the kind of futures

we want to see unfold?

What does it mean to not only

improve the human hardware

but the software as well?

I came to Oakland to sit with

a Zen priest named Rev. Angel

to learn about why,

even with all these new tools,

being human today in so many

ways feels harder, not easier,

than it ever has before.

What does it mean

to be human?

To care

to be connected

and to be compassionate.

My take is that we are

in deep yearning

and we're not

comfortable with that.

We've created so much division

and separation and connection,

and we don't know how

to get back to ourselves.

We put everything outside,

and then we're

turning around, looking,

and going, "Am I OK?"

We just spend our lives

going, like, "Am I OK?"

Where does the pain

come from right now

that is kind of

reverberating

throughout society?

Yeah, it's disconnect.

All of that is disconnect,

disconnect from--you know,

we have a planet

that is, like,

screaming bloody m*rder for us

to either, like,

get off of it or get with it.

We have come to accept

someone else's

limited imagination

of what it means

to be human,

that we are here, basically,

clubbing each other to death,

trying to get ahead.

We have to yield

the notion that we are--

we are defined

by what we produce.

We have to give

ourselves over

to the understanding that--

that we have inherent worth

and, therefore,

let go of the ways

in which our worth

is being defined.

When you get off that train

and you recognize

that care and connection is

the thing that allows you

to be alive, to see,

to taste, to feel,

it shifts entirely

what you think is important.

What you drive towards,

what is actually moving you

is entirely different.

Wallach, voice-over: In the face

of so much change and turmoil

in the world around us,

it's beautiful to remember

just how simple and sacred it

really is to be a human being.

And when I actually slow down

long enough to remember,

it does fill me with a renewed

sense of hope and possibility

for who and what we can become.

If built within us all is

the capacity

for love and compassion,

then what does it look like

to extend that

to those around us?

In a moment

when we constantly see

the effects of us at our worst,

I'm interested

in people who can show us

what's possible

when we come to see ourselves

and those around us

as innately human.

So I came to Los Angeles

to spend time

with a group of people who are

using music to do just that.

Ready? And

Cycle. Beautiful job

So my name's Tony Brown,

and I'm the CEO

of Heart of Los Angeles,

and I'm the co-founder

of the Intergenerational

Music Programs.

Tell me

how it got started.

Give me kind of

the origin story

and what it is now.

So when we first

started thinking

about the Intergenerational

orchestra programs,

we wanted to make sure

that we were reaching

into the African-American

communities

in Los Angeles County,

we wanted to make sure

we were reaching

into the elder communities

throughout Los Angeles,

and we wanted

to make sure, of course,

we hit not only

Latinx, Filipino,

but our Korean brothers

and sisters, too,

that this was not

just going to be

any other orchestra or

every other orchestra.

This was gonna be one that

was truly intergenerational

and, likely,

truly multicultural.

Piano, piano, piano, piano!

So why do that, right?

Because it'd be much easier

to just have

a youth orchestra

Sure.

and have an elder orchestra.

What's the thinking behind an

intergenerational orchestra?

This orchestra opportunity

gives everyone the chance

to dust off

their instrument, right,

and pick it back up again

and go on a journey together.

And I think for the elders,

it's what they look

forward to every week.

It's maybe the one thing

they look forward to

most every week.

And for the young people,

the incredible wisdom

that they gain

from their elders

and also the sense

of empowerment

they get

from teaching an elder--

how to remember the fingering

that, you know,

we used to know

10 and 15 years ago--

is pretty special to see.

Those of us who are

providing youth services

realize that it's

so critically important

for young people to have

caring adults

in their lives.

And for many

of our young people,

that's hard to come by,

and for, you know,

of course,

our adults, our elders,

there's no reason they

should ever have to,

you know,

live or die alone.

They should be able to exit

this great Earth knowing

that they've touched

the lives of others

and are loved

and will be missed.

Wallach, voice-over: Tony's love

for this unique orchestra is

evident, but even more so is his

belief that human compassion

has the ability

to cut across differences

and transform our lives

and communities.

Tony, voice-over:

You look at an orchestra,

and it's a metaphor to me

of coming together

and producing

something beautiful,

even though there's different

types of instruments

that make different sounds,

you know,

that are different sizes.

And yet, when you

bring them together

through

this common experience

of learning

and developing together

at the same time,

growing together,

lifelong learning together,

to then produce

this beautiful sound,

it gives you hope that

despite our differences,

we can come together

and make something

beautiful happen.

And that's what we

should be doing

not only inside

of an orchestra program,

but throughout

our communities.

Every single

interaction you have

with every other human,

every single one

of them has the opportunity

for an experience of grace

and connection and wonder.

Empathy is our ability

to perceive,

understand,

and to some extent,

feel the emotions

and pain of others.

And it's so central to us all

being on this planet,

because without collaboration,

reciprocity,

and helping behaviors,

none of us would be here.

It's so simple

to look around and see

what actually needs to be done.

Whose hand needs to be held?

Who's sitting alone on a bench?

The really

burning question is,

Can empathy be taught?

Because most people think

it's an inborn trait,

you know, that you

either have or you don't,

and that you can't do

much about it.

And I think

that's an accepted view,

so people don't even try.

One of the most exciting things

about our research

was that we really

dispelled the myth.

We learned that empathy

can be augmented.

When we realize that

there are certain ways

to nurture empathy,

that's something we can teach.

It can start

when children are very young.

Feeling with someone is

altogether different.

That means part of you--

part of yourself has been

touched by that person's pain

enough to want to relieve it.

Up until

having kids, I always kind of

viewed my life very much

as like a 100-yard dash, right?

Like, Ari is born.

I do a bunch of stuff,

and then Ari dies.

All of a sudden, I have kids.

I remember at one point

holding one of my daughters

kind of, you know, skin to skin,

and for the first time,

felt emotion that was

actually outside

of my physical body.

Like, I had actually,

in some ways,

transcended

my biological hardware footprint

in a way that

was totally unexpected.

The other thing was

I transcended time.

You know,

they were like time machines,

but they were these,

like, gifts from the future.

And I now for the first time

saw how my actions

were going to affect the world

that my children will inhabit,

that my grandchildren

will inhabit.

How can we expand

the temporal horizons

that we're all operating within

and are comfortable

thinking within

and really look beyond a time

that goes ahead of

our own individual lifespans?

How do we think

about generations

who will inherit this planet?

And in the policies

that we're making,

in the businesses

that we're launching,

in the products that

we're designing,

how can we lead

from a place of care?

These ideas

of seeing beyond ourselves

and our one lifetime

are more important

right now than ever.

If empathy is a muscle

that grows when we use it,

what does it look like

to foster more of it

in a world desperate for more

compassion and connection?

In Amsterdam, these ideas

aren't theoretical.

They're being put to use,

creating

new ways of caring for the most

vulnerable in our societies.

I'm Jannette Spiering,

and I am a founder

of the Hogeweyk,

which is a dementia village.

I want to talk

a little bit about aging,

kind of, in general.

How do you see

those stigmas around aging,

and how do you see

those changing?

I sometimes think

that old age

is seen as an illness.

It's also maybe

kind of a nuisance.

And that really

has to change,

because there will be

so many elderly people

in the future

everywhere

in every country.

Many of them will become

diagnosed with dementia.

One in three people

in the world

will die with a diagnosis

of dementia.

Imagine that.

It is fearful

to think of that.

And especially

when you are aware

that we cannot segregate

all these people

from society.

So what are some

of the characteristics that

we'll find in this village

that, for instance,

we wouldn't find in,

you know,

a block

institutional setting?

What we try to do is

to get away

from the institute.

Nursing homes are--

well, as I see them--

awful institutes, where

people are locked in

and segregated

from society.

Everything that you will

find in the Hogeweyk

is different from

a regular institute.

The way people live

together, for example.

We created houses where

7 people live together.

Every meal is cooked

in the houses.

And you have to go

to a supermarket

to get your groceries to be

able to create that meal.

So we have a supermarket

on the premises.

You can decide

by yourself

if you want

to go for a walk

or if you want to become

a member of a club

or you just want to visit

a concert in the theater.

People who live here

need support,

but they are still

part of society.

This is a complete

humanization

of the care,

what you see.

I think that we must

accept that growing old

is just part of

what life is

and that we must accept

everything

that comes with it.

And how well-intended

the institutions we build

to keep people safe

actually take away

everything

that you have

as a human being.

And I think that

if we are able

to think different

about that,

that's a good start.

Wallach, voice-over: This unique

form of community and care

has led to significant results,

including greatly reducing

the dependency on medication.

That's a big deal.

In a future where the number

of people with dementia

is expected to double

by 2030 and triple by 2050,

the work they're doing here asks

all kinds of questions about

how we can adapt

our methods of care

and even extend beyond

just human care alone.

As we train machines

to be more and more humanlike,

as AI technologies

continue to accelerate,

what are the values

we are imbuing them with?

In the 1800s, there was

a mathematician, Ada Lovelace,

and in the footnotes of papers

that she was translating

about one of

the very first computers,

she starts describing

a computer that

someday may think

just like humans.

This is really important,

because for hundreds of years,

we've been trying to figure out

how to replicate life,

how to replicate

the human experience.

The machine uses

only two sounds

produced electrically.

Say "She saw me."

She saw me.

Slowly over time

Hello. I am Macintosh.

we've started to make

inroads

developing computers

that feel more human,

that seem like

they might be thinking.

If you're talking to a chatbot

and that chatbot appears

to exhibit emotion

or appears to want to connect

with you on a deeper level,

would you say that

that chatbot is human?

Boy, that really

blows my digital mind.

Now, most people would say no.

They would describe it as

a really humanlike interaction,

but we're still using

the word "human."

All of these different

philosophical questions,

they actually matter a lot,

because these are the very

research ideas that are

being pursued as we're

building out these technologies

that eventually are gonna

impact all of our lives.

Wallach, voice-over:

Someone who has been

at the forefront of this work

is musician Grimes,

and I wanted to get

her perspective

on where we are

in this evolution,

the creative potential

she sees,

and the importance of hope

in what comes next.

As an artist,

what do you feel is, like,

the moral imperative

of this moment in time?

I did a poll recently

on Twitter

where I asked people, like,

if they had any purpose

in their life

And, like, it was like,

70% of people said

no or something.

Wow.

Like, if there's

ever a moment to have

a feeling of purpose,

I think it would be now,

because what we do

and the things we create

over the next few decades

will probably shape, like,

all minds going forward

for the rest of time.

And so if there was ever

a time to have purpose,

I think it's really,

yeah, like, right now.

How should artists, then,

be thinking about

how they work

with technology,

and, really, in many ways,

specifically AI?

I really think there

is actually, like,

a beautiful amount of

opportunity here right now.

Grimes, voice-over: When I

started making music,

there was sort of

this revolution happening

in music production.

More people were being

able to make music

at home

on their computers.

And I think there was

a massive democratization

of who was allowed

to make music that, like,

I took huge advantage of,

that was

fully the byproduct

of technology.

And I think this is about

to extend to all of art.

You know, when I see some of

the new stuff coming with AI,

like video to video

and text to video

and all this stuff that,

like, is about

to explode.

And I think it's

so beautiful that, like,

when everyone

has the same tools

that can make

professional quality stuff,

then, like, you get to see

the actual talent,

like, really rise

to the top.

You've said

consciousness is sacred.

Yeah.

Tell me more about that.

I think

because we're all alive,

we all, like,

take it for granted

that, like, I can think

and I have agency

and I can feel.

You know, if we're really

alone in the universe,

which it seems like,

I think the thing

that's happening here

right now,

like, this is, like,

literally God or something.

This is, like,

the universe waking up

and perceiving itself.

I think the single

most important thing is

to make sure that this

spark that exists

here on planet Earth

gets to be elsewhere.

And I don't even really

care if it's biological life

or digital life

or something like that.

I--I'm really a proponent

of, like,

keeping the humans alive.

But, like, if it's

silicon-based life

that goes out there,

I think that's just as good.

I just--I think the universe

is empty and quiet,

and it wants to be

woken up

and filled

with beautiful things.

Wallach, voice-over: It makes me

excited to think that

we really are on the threshold

of wild and wonderful new ideas

about who

and what we can become.

But if we're gonna create

the futures we want to see

for our kids and grandkids,

new technologies

will only take us so far.

How we choose to use them

matters more than ever.

In Brooklyn,

a group of artists are using AI

to create

an immersive-art experience

aimed at examining our

relationship with these tools

in fascinating new ways.

What we're seeing today

is a collected work of

what Ouchhh collective calls

data generative painting.

What that fundamentally means

is that they in their studio

took enormously

large data sets--

millions of lines of text,

millions of paintings,

petabytes and petabytes

of data--

fed them into a computer,

and let the computer

seek out patterns within it.

The computer

then generates new data.

And then the folks

at Ouchhh collective

feed that into software,

and the software

puts it on the walls.

Through these powerful

algorithms that they built,

they could take the human

experience in toto, right--

massive data sets--

and you could learn something.

So this

is the server room.

This is where

all the stuff lives

that operates

all the stuff in there.

So the EEG takes six different

types of brainwave data.

Each of those

different dimensions

gets assigned

something to manipulate

within the visual palette,

right?

So it could be that, you know,

the amplitude of the wave is

the thing that changes

the color frequency.

All it takes is

a little bit of human input

to say, "OK, we'll make

a scene with these shapes

or with this patterning."

But the possibilities

are endless.

It's only a matter of sort of

the length of your creativity.

When we have

a large audience,

we'll have the audience

wear heartbeat monitors

on their wrists.

Those get fed

into the computer,

and those start to manipulate

the visuals as well.

If the goal is great

collective experience,

which I would hope

immersive art should be,

we get ever closer to it

when we incorporate audience

into performance as well.

What we've really

been able to do is

tap into the feedback loop

of the human soul.

That musician is having

an emotional response

to whatever they're doing

in the moment.

Whether that's

the music itself,

whether that's the audience's

reaction to the music,

whether it's

the visuals on the wall,

they're having

an emotional reaction.

Wallach, voice-over: It's

a profound feeling to experience

both humans and machines

collaborating in real time.

This is just the beginning.

And as these tools

continue to evolve,

expanding our ability

to imagine and create,

what will we choose

to use them for?

What new possibilities

will we unlock?

And what kind of

human and nonhuman potential

is waiting to be unleashed?

But as limitless as these

new tools are proving to be,

we are still finite beings.

And one of the things

that holds us back

from imagining

creating better futures

is we often work so hard

to deny our own mortality.

But what would change

and what could be possible

if we didn't see death

as the end?

How much bigger

could our imagination

about the future become

if we were comfortable

thinking further forward

than our own single lifetime?

I came to Arizona

to meet Alua Arthur,

someone who has spent her life

helping people

face death

with grace and dignity.

She is what's called

a death doula,

and in addition to working

with her own patients,

this weekend,

she was here to train others,

who are embarking on this unique

form of service themselves.

Life is an utter gift.

To watch life leave a body,

the utter stillness

that happens

after a death has occurred,

is a really poignant

reminder

that life hangs

on the breath.

You know, that it's here

one minute and gone the next.

And so by virtue

of continuing to have it,

I am still partaking

in this tremendous gift

that I've been given--

that I'm still alive,

that I still get

to talk to people

and feel cold on my skin

and eat delicious food

and hug and laugh and dance

and just be here

while I'm here.

I've also learned that

humans are extraordinary.

We're such a miracle.

It takes so many

katrillion of functions

just to keep our bodies going.

And so when the body can no

longer and it's time to die,

that's also really

awe-inspiring,

that it carries on for so long,

and then when it can't,

we have no choice

but to surrender to

the fact that it can't.

What is it that,

in your experience,

leads to the level

of kind of death anxiety

or the fear of death

in our society right now?

At its root, I think, is

the very fragile human ego

that thinks of itself

as the main character

in the story

and is so afraid

of it not existing anymore,

and so we shun it.

We recoil

against that idea.

We want to stay alive.

We want to be around.

We want to do all the things

because we are

so attached to who we are

and our being alive.

We're afraid of it.

It's a big unknown also.

Like, nobody knows

what happens after we die,

and that makes us

really uncomfortable.

We feel powerless

in the face of the unknown.

We also feel powerless

against death itself,

and that makes us want

to avoid it at all costs.

Wallach, voice-over:

Rather than avoiding it,

Alua has spent years now

helping those who are dying

as well as the loved ones

they are leaving behind.

She's come to believe

that a relationship to death

is directly connected to

our relationship to the future

and to life itself.

Welcome.

This evening, we're going

to do a death meditation.

This next time

that we have together

is about you and your death,

you with you--

one on one, one on one--

you and your body

and the journey that you're

gonna go on with your own body.

All right?

So get comfortable,

as much as possible.

Get cozy.

Death is inevitable.

All of us will die

sooner or later.

In about a hundred years,

all the humans currently

on the planet will be gone,

except for the few

who are just being born

and will live long lifespans.

No one has escaped death,

not even the great masters

and teachers of our time.

Every person and every creature

on the planet will die.

When it's time to actually die,

it will be in an ordinary moment

just like this one.

Your breathing

is getting shallower.

Your energy is draining.

Your body temperature

begins to drop.

Your connection to this earth

beneath you is slipping.

You are aware now

that you are dying.

Your body is

no longer relevant.

Your material possessions

cannot help.

Your loved ones

cannot save you.

You will speak no more words.

You begin to experience

a sense of expanding,

connecting with all that ever

was and all that ever will be.

See yourself as a candle,

a small flickering flame.

And with a gust of wind,

see that flame

now extinguished.

Now take

another deep breath in.

Bring in strong, holding it,

and release.

You are very much alive.

Bring awareness to your body.

Wiggle your toes.

Rotate your feet.

Life forces are swirling

inside of you.

Everything is functioning.

You just did

a death meditation,

and I'm very proud of you.

Wallach, voice-over: I will

never, ever forget the feeling

of being in the room

there that night.

It's counterintuitive,

but facing our own mortality

holds a key

to seeing ourselves

as just a part of

the larger human story,

one piece of the future

that we can both build

and soon leave behind.

What does it mean

to live like we're dying?

It means to live presently.

It means to be with

where I am today,

recognizing that everything

I have in this moment,

what I've done so far,

what I've given so far,

who I've been so far

has been enough,

and that, if tomorrow is it,

I can go satisfied.

I think we

have to change the register

at which human activity

is taking place, right?

Where right now,

we're really stuck

in an industrial register,

where we understand ourselves

in terms of our utility value,

right?

How much work can I get done?

How valuable am I?

How much money can I make?

There's always a metric.

How many likes did I get?

How many of this?

How many followers do I have?

It's very utilitarian.

I mean, I was raised

on "Mr. Rogers," right?

And Mr. Rogers, at the end

of every show, would say

I like you

exactly as you are.

I took him seriously.

I took that to mean

I am OK just the way I am.

I don't need to do anything

to justify my existence.

The positive human future

involves

us recognizing and retrieving

what matters

about our existence.

So if you could

give yourself some advice,

you know, talk to yourself

when you were in your 20s,

what would you say

to your 20-something self,

knowing what you know now?

I would tell myself

"Everything's

going to be OK,"

because I worried

so much in my youth,

in my 20s, my 30s,

also as a single mom,

and a lot of

different things,

but it was very difficult,

and I worried

about everything.

Instead of living

for the days,

I was surviving

through the days.

I would tell myself,

"You did good, girl."

You got--you got

to this point.

You got it.

Yeah.

I would tell

my 20-something-year-old self

that there is time.

"Experience life,

"and don't be

in such a hurry to be put

into that task-oriented,

day-to-day existence."

I would tell myself

that I'm not invincible

and I'm not exempt.

"You're gonna get through this,

and you're gonna be OK,

and, you know, it's gonna be

all right down the road."

I would tell myself,

"You are enough.

"You are wonderful.

You are precious."

"Be patient."

I'd go, "You will learn

everything you need

to get to the destination

you want."

I would say, "Stop

and smell the flowers.

"Go visit

your grandparents.

Listen to their stories."

You know, go pay those ones

respect and time,

'cause you don't have them

anymore now,

and it would have

been nice to have

a little more time

spent with them.

Wallach, voice-over:

You know, on the one hand,

visiting your parents'

gravesite is really intense,

because it's, like,

where they are,

but it's also not

where they are, right?

I was thinking this earlier.

Like, when I tell,

like, an off-color joke,

that's where my dad is.

Or when I see, like,

47 different colors

in a sunset,

that's where my mom is.

So on the one hand, it feels

like this is the place,

but then, like,

the whole planet feels like

the place when certain things

happen.

You know, I was 18 years old

when my father passed away.

But the love was

very thick in the home.

I don't see such

a stark line between, like,

his life and my life.

Like, different biologies,

different names.

But there's a kind of--

there's a thread,

both with my father

and my mother,

that just feels like it

is just going through me

and going into the kids.

And so whereas

I feel like, yes,

there are different bodies,

that thread, whatever that is,

feels very deep

and continuous.

The future is not

set in stone,

and I don't believe in destiny.

I know that at any moment,

we can change course.

We just have to make a decision

that we're gonna do that,

which means that

we have agency.

We have the ability to create

a future that we want.

I will be honest. Um, I--

you know, I am seeing

some pretty, pretty dark things

on the horizon.

There's no turning

these things off,

but we can forge a path forward.

Even though I read

the paper, like many people do,

and see so many challenges

that we have in cities,

counties, our country,

dysfunction, you know,

what motivates me is that

I know that I'm helping

to develop young people

into making the future

a heck of a lot brighter

than sometimes the things

I read in the paper.

It's the greatest luxury

in the world

to be able to intelligently

design the future.

Like, this is something

that is new.

This is something that is, like,

really just, like,

a product of modernity.

And I think we should definitely

take that opportunity.

A lot of what we need

to do right now is

actually evolve

our tools to better fit

how our minds work with

the technology that we have.

Creativity is the fuel

for all of this.

There should be

a place for humans,

for human life

in the digital future.

Not revolution but renaissance,

the rebirth of old ideas

in a new context.

Then we can begin

to live sustainably

as a form of human flourishing

rather than sustainably

as some negation of human need.

The Dalai Lama said

that love and compassion

are necessities, not luxuries

and without them,

humanity will not survive.

I think the primary story is

about our connection

rather than the story

about our disconnect.

It is true that we are

suffering from disconnect.

But understanding

the reason that we

feel so much pain from it

is because we have

a yearning to be connected.

I think part

of the magic of being human

is that the mundane is

where all the juice is.

When I know that this time

that I have here is finite,

then every breath matters more,

every birthday matters more,

every hug matters more.

We're at

this inflection point

for h*m* sapiens,

and a lot of folks

are basically focusing on

the external future's

environment.

Super important, obviously--

artificial intelligence,

bioengineering,

climate change, inequality.

A host of issues, conundrums,

problems, and opportunities

that manifest

in the external reality,

the external world around us.

But at the same time,

we have to focus

on internal futures.

How do we evolve the internal

as much as we evolve

the external?