Its origins are
unknown.
The degree of
erosion that we see has to go
back to 10,000 BC.
Its secrets have
remained hidden for thousands of
years.
It was
reported that they found
passages into these hidden
chambers.
And it may hold the
truth behind our very existence.
It reads, "I
have under me the knowledge of
our genesis."
The Great Sphinx of
Giza is perhaps the most
mysterious monument on Earth.
But once its riddle is solved,
will we find the ultimate proof
that our ancestors were visited
by alien beings?
What's
staring us in the face goes back
to when extraterrestrials walked
the earth with human beings.
Millions of people
around the world believe we have
been visited in the past by
extraterrestrial beings.
What if it were true?
Did ancient aliens really help
to shape our history?
And if so, might the proof lie
hidden with the mysteries of
the Sphinx?
The Giza Plateau.
Egypt, 1925.
Rising out of the desert sand is
a giant stone statue of a human
head.
For centuries, most visitors to
the area believed this was all
that existed.
But French engineer Emile
Baraize is convinced that much
more lies beneath the surface
than even archeologists are
aware of.
He begins an excavation to
uncover it, and after 11 years
of extensive digging, Baraize
unearths a massive body
resembling a lion and
reintroduces the world to the
full splendor of the Great
Sphinx.
It is the largest monolithic
sculpture on Earth.
It must have
been quite eerie to be there
back then, not knowing a lot
about the ancient Egyptian
history, and having this huge
structure staring down at you.
Facing east toward
the rising sun, the Great Sphinx
is located nearly half a mile
from Egypt's three largest
pyramids.
It is carved from a single piece
of limestone bedrock, and stands
over 60 feet tall and 240 feet
long.
People have asked
themselves for centuries.
What was the Sphinx for?
Why was it built?
There is a story behind it, but
what is the story?
The Sphinx is
arguably one of the most studied
monuments in the world, yet it
remains one of the most
mysterious.
There are no inscriptions on the
Sphinx to indicate who built it
or why, but most Egyptologists
date it to 2,500 BC--
the time of the pharaoh Khafre,
or Chephren, as he is known by
Greek scholars.
The dating is based on a mention
of Khafre on a tablet found
between the paws of the Sphinx.
But this tablet-known as the
Dream Stele-also tells the
story of a pharaoh who came
1,000 years later--
King Thutmose IV.
King Thutmose IV
comes in a new kingdom, which we
believe is more than 1,000 years
after the time the Sphinx was
sculpted.
He made this stele to tell his
story.
King Thutmose IV, before
becoming a king, was on an
expedition here in Giza.
And he slept right next to the
Sphinx.
And back then, the Sphinx was
covered in sand all the way up
to its head.
And in his dream, the sphinx
came to him.
The sphinx
spoke to him and said that if he
would uncover the Sphinx from
the burial in the sand, he would
then end up as pharaoh.
Now, he was the son of a pharaoh
but was not the heir.
Thutmose IV ended up with that
throne after this dream.
The sphinx itself speaks to a
future pharaoh and the history
of ancient Egypt is altered by
this fact.
The sphinx told King
Thutmose IV in his sleep-right
here in that line-that
everything that the eye of the
Lord illuminates will be his.
He cleared all the sand
surrounding the Sphinx, and
Thutmose IV then became the
king.
So the sphinx kept his promise.
Now, the
amazing thing about this is
that we learn of what's called
the "flashing eye of the Lord".
What is the flashing eye of the
Lord?
This sounds like some kind of
technology that is in
communication with the sphinx
or perhaps channeled by the
sphinx, that could ensure the
prosperity of Thutmose IV.
If the story on the
Dream Stele is true, the sphinx
not only ensured the prosperity
of Thutmose IV, but of perhaps
the most important dynastic
family in the history of the
Egyptian empire.
Thutmose IV was
actually the grandfather of
Akhenaten.
Akhenaten was
considered a heretical pharaoh.
He changed the polytheistic
religion of ancient Egypt and
declared there was only one god:
Aten.
A god he depicted as a disk in
the sky.
Akhenaten became
enthralled with the Aten disk.
Is it possible that the eye of
the Lord and the Aten disk are
one and the same and that they
are in fact, some kind of UFO
spaceship that's hovering over
Egypt as an eye in the sky and
is guiding the Egyptian
civilization?
Could it be that
the eye of the Lord and the
Aten are describing the same
object?
And if so, was Egyptian
civilization being guided by
extraterrestrials that used the
Sphinx as a means of
communication?
Might the Dream Stele be proof
that this mysterious monolithic
statue was built long before the
pharaoh Khafre?
Ancient astronaut theorists say
yes, and point to yet another
line of the Dream Stele as
proof.
There's something
else written on the Sphinx that
was ignored by Egyptologists.
The Sphinx actually says "I have
been here since the first time."
Now, the word in ancient
Egyptian for "first time"
is Zep Tepi.
And what he meant by this is the
time when Osiris had come at the
beginning of the civilization.
The Egyptians talk
about a golden age; a golden age
that existed 12,500 or so years
ago.
This is something that goes back
at least 8,000 years before the
current accepted chronology of
Egypt.
At that time the gods mingled or
walked with men.
Could this
extraordinary monument be a
remnant from a golden age when
extraterrestrials coexisted with
humans, as ancient astronaut
theorists suggest?
If so, does the Sphinx date back
thousands of years before
conventional scholars believe
possible?
Perhaps further clues of its
true age can be found in the
geological record of the Giza
Plateau.
Boston, Massachusetts.
Geologist Dr. Robert Schoch has
studied the geological features
of the Sphinx for over 20 years.
I looked specifically
at the weathering and erosion on
the body of the Sphinx, on the
walls of the Sphinx enclosure.
I saw weathering patterns that
were not compatible with the
Sahara conditions of the last
5,000 years.
Here we have a photograph of the
Sphinx on the left side.
This is the rump of the Sphinx.
This is the wall of the Sphinx
enclosure.
When you look at this, these are
the lines of rock, or the
strata, as we say, geologically.
You can see how they've been
weathered out, sort of a
rounded, rolling profile.
This is caused by rain beating
down and running over the rock.
And this was very evident to me
as a geologist.
According to
archaeologists, significant
rainfall in the Giza Plateau
would date back to before 3,000
BC, at least 500 years before
the time attributed to the
building of the Sphinx.
The degree and level
of erosion that we see on the
Great Sphinx has to go back to
that earlier climatic period,
and not just a few hundred
years-thousands of years
before Sahara times.
This put us back to at least
5,000, maybe 7,000, 8,000, I now
suspect even 10,000 BC.
If we are to
subscribe to the idea that the
Sphinx displays markings of
water erosion, then that means
that what's staring us in the
face is much, much older than
what mainstream science
proposes.
Is the Sphinx
really older than our history
books have led us to believe?
If so, who-or what-was
responsible for its
construction?
Perhaps further clues can be
found by examining the face of
the Sphinx... and what it might
have looked like before it was
altered.
Cairo, Egypt.
January, 2011.
Thousands of antigovernment
protesters clash with riot police.
They are demanding the
resignation of President Hosni Mubarak.
Civil unrest escalates...
leaving hundreds dead and
thousands injured in the wake of
the Arab Spring.
Just eight miles away, the
Great Sphinx bears silent witness.
For thousands of years, and
through numerous conflicts, the
monument has remained unscathed,
except for the loss of its
nose.
The nose was broken.
Many people accuse Napoleon of
doing that... to take potshots
with his cannons.
But, in fact, it was done long
before.
A Muslim ruler in the Middle Ages decided
that the Sphinx represented a
guardian of the underworld...
that he was a type of demon and
that he was dangerous.
It was believed that he might
have been some kind of dark god,
and as a result, the Sphinx was
vandalized.
After many years of
study, evidence of just who the
face on the Sphinx belongs to
remains circumstantial and is
debated by researchers.
Most scholars attribute the face
to Khafre, the pharaoh they
propose built the Sphinx.
But ancient astronaut theorists
claim that the Sphinx was not
built by Khafre, as mainstream
historians suggest.
They say that the Sphinx
predates the age of the
pharaohs, and propose that the
true head of the Sphinx has not
been seen for thousands of
years.
Many people have
suggested, including scholars,
that the current head that's on
that massive body... is way too
small for it to be proportional
to the body...
because it was reshaped,
re-carved at a later date.
If you think about that for a
moment, that's highly
fascinating, because what did
that thing look like in its
original form?
It has been suggested
that perhaps originally it was
the face of a lion, or the head
of a lion.
McGOWAN: I think there is an
argument that the head of the
Sphinx was a full lion's head.
And I think that there is power
to the theory that the Sphinx
actually represented the
constellation of Leo.
Curiously, there's
no reference to a statue of a
Great Sphinx, or even a great
lion, in any Old Kingdom texts.
But one scholar who has
extensively studied the monument
proposes that this is due to the
fact that it was originally
something entirely different.
When I saw the
body, I instantly thought,
"That's no lion's body."
Now, if you study a lion, it has
great big shoulders...
it has a sloping back.
And so you do not have a
straight back for a lion.
It couldn't be more obvious
that this is a dog's body--
that's exactly how they crouch
when they're in a guarding
position.
And there's only one dog it
could be-that has to be
Anubis.
Anubis is a dog god, who is the
guardian of the sacred
Necropolis.
Well, Giza is the sacred
Necropolis.
And I went through the ancient
texts, and I found it mentioned
everywhere.
The Pyramid Texts and the
Book of Gates and the Book of
Caverns and the Book of Two
Ways and all those ancient
books, and they're talking about
it the whole time.
The easiest thing to do when
trying to destroy the Sphinx is
to knock the pointy ears and the
pointy nose off, which is what
Anubis had.
So this is the remaining stump
from which they could fashion a
human head.
That's what they did, and it was
a very clever job, and
everybody's still in awe of it
even though they don't know any
longer that it was meant to be
Anubis at one time.
The Egyptian god
Anubis is one of the most
prominently featured figures in
all of Egyptian art.
He was considered a protector of
graves, the god of
mummification, and is associated
with the resurrection of the god
Osiris.
Anubis is clearly
identified as a god of the dead.
He symbolizes the afterlife.
His importance is enormous in
these resurrection activities
that went on.
Is it possible that
the head of the Sphinx was
originally carved to look
completely different than it
does today?
And if so, could it have had the
face of Anubis?
A god that ancient astronaut
theorists propose was an actual
being who visited our planet in
the remote past?
The Egyptians
themselves genuinely believed
that these were actual beings
who had dog's head or jackal
heads.
The god Anubis
is listed as one of those who
came during Zep Tepi, or the
First Time, one of the ancient,
ancient ancients who is openly
cited in Egyptian mythology as
being an extraterrestrial.
Is it possible that
the first pharaohs didn't build
the Sphinx, but discovered it?
And might they have actually
recarved its face?
Perhaps the answer can be found
by examining not when the Great
Sphinx was built, but why.
The Giza
Necropolis, which consists of
three great pyramids, guarded by
the Sphinx, is the last
remaining of the Seven Wonders
of the Ancient World.
The original purpose of the
complex is still debated by
historians, as is the connection
of the three pyramids to each
other, and to the Sphinx.
There is no question
in my mind, and in the mind of
many researchers, that the Giza
Necropolis is a planned project.
It isn't just pharaohs who came
and put their pyramids
haphazardly, and then built the
Sphinx.
The geometry of the site makes
it very unlikely that it's not a
designed project.
Is it possible that
the Sphinx and the pyramids were
designed to function together?
Ancient astronaut theorists say
yes, and suggest a recently
unearthed tomb could provide
proof.
Just 200 feet from the Sphinx,
in a causeway connecting the
second pyramid to its temple
complex, is an entrance to what
is believed to be the ceremonial
burial chamber of the god
Osiris.
The Osiris shaft was first
unearthed in 1934, but only
fully explored in 1999.
This place has not
been visited much.
It's probably been visited only
a handful of times since 1999.
Right here is the first level.
The first level is not that
deep.
The Osiris shaft
actually consists of three
different shafts that descend to
three separate chambers.
The final chamber is buried
nearly ten stories underground,
and contains what some say is
the sarcophagus of Osiris.
Here we are a hundred
feet deep.
The third and final chamber in
the Osiris shaft.
And here's the sarcophagus right
in front of me.
This is only the lid of the
sarcophagus.
The body of the sarcophagus is
under the water, and it's at
least three times the size of
the lid.
And to the four corners of the
islands, there were four pillars
that are now nearly completely
destroyed.
The four had hieroglyphic
inscriptions on them.
Some of which read "God Osiris,
the god of the underground."
While most scholars
believe Osiris to be a mythical
being, and his tomb merely
symbolic, ancient astronaut
theorists suggest that not only
was Osiris real, but this
nine-foot sarcophagus offers
evidence of extraterrestrial
intervention in the remote past.
The word,
"sarcophagus," means,
"flesh eater."
And this is like a giant black box.
Flesh and blood being goes into
the box, is sealed in it.
The box consumes them, and the
body disappears.
The idea of a
sarcophagus that has no
actual mummy or body in it
suggests the possibility of
teleportation and the
possibility of the transmutation
of the physical body.
It is a suggestion, perhaps,
that those who built that
monument and those underground
rooms could completely portal
out of our reality entirely.
Could it be that
what was discovered in the
Osiris shaft were the remnants
of advanced technology?
Technology that would allow for
travel to other worlds?
According to the pyramid texts--
funerary inscriptions that were
carved on the walls of the early
Egyptian tombs-the sacred
Necropolis would serve as a
gateway to the pharaoh's
resurrection and ascension to
join the god Osiris in the
heavens.
The foundational
premise of ancient Egyptian myth
is that Osiris came from the
stars, and that when he was
resurrected, he went and dwelled
in the star system Orion as a
celestial being.
The ancient Egyptians clearly
describe their Great Pyramid as
a resurrection machine, as a
teleportation device.
The Sphinx functioned as the
gateway.
Egyptologists have
always assumed that the pyramids
in Egypt were tombs for the
pharaohs.
And yet, no pharaoh or Egyptian
dynastic mummy was ever found in
a pyramid in Egypt.
A number of researchers have
recently maintained that the
Great Pyramid, and some of the
other pyramids in Egypt, are
actually these very
sophisticated power plants.
You have to wonder if the
pyramids themselves weren't
created to generate tremendous
amounts of energy.
Energy that was needed to open
the stargates.
And this was part of the
resurrection scheme.
Could the Giza
complex actually have functioned
as some sort of technological
device?
A device that acted as a
transport to other worlds, as
ancient astronaut theorists
suggest?
Perhaps further evidence of such
a connection can be found by
examining the precise alignments
found on the Plateau.
Archeo-astronomical analysis has
revealed that the position of
the three great pyramids seem to
be mirroring the three belt
stars of Orion.
There's two bright
stars and a third dimmer star,
which is offset a bit to the
left.
Now, the odd thing is that even
though the correlation is very,
very clear to see, the angle
that the stars make in the sky
is much sharper than the angles
of the pyramid.
And there is where, after many
years of studying this, I
decided to take the leap of
faith.
Was there a time when these
stars would be exactly how we
see them on the ground?
The Great Pyramid
contains within it several
shafts, one of which forms a
45-degree angle toward the sky.
Bauval was able to calculate the
historical movement of the stars
to determine the date when the
shaft would point directly to
the belt stars.
Amazingly, when I did
this, what we had was the full
set of monuments locking to this
date of 10,500 BC.
Is it mere
coincidence that the pyramids
were strategically aligned to
correspond to the three belt
stars of Orion precisely
12,500 years ago?
And if so, does this date hold a
profound significance to Earth's
history?
Perhaps the answers will be
revealed in the quest to uncover
a secret chamber.
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 1932.
American psychic and healer
Edgar Cayce, known as the
sleeping prophet, gains
worldwide attention by remotely
diagnosing illnesses in patients
located hundreds of miles away
with an astounding degree of
accuracy.
He could
diagnose people's physical
problems.
He could tell you what's in a
book.
He could find something at a
great distance.
He could even read the akashic
record, the book of life.
During one of his
many psychic trances, Cayce
makes an astonishing claim
regarding the Sphinx.
Edgar Cayce could
tell you about prehistory and
reincarnation and what your soul
had been doing prior to this
incarnation.
He actually gave readings for
his own soul that had been a
high priest in ancient Egypt and
was directly associated with the
building of the Sphinx.
Edgar Cayce had in
his readings a statement that
the Sphinx and the pyramids were
built in approximately
10,490 BC.
There's a strong suggestion that
the Cayce readings were
accurate, and therefore their
dating of the Sphinx and the
pyramids also was accurate.
Up until his death
in 1945, Cayce gave dozens of
readings about the Sphinx.
These readings claimed the
Sphinx was directly related to
an ancient civilization that
many believe once existed here
on Earth-the lost continent of
Atlantis.
The Edgar Cayce
readings specifically say that
Atlantis, as recorded by Plato,
was not a myth.
He leaked that information given
to him by the Egyptian
priesthood and put it into his
books the Timaeus and the
Critias.
Here is the
interesting thing: Plato
describes that Atlantis existed
exactly at the same time that
ancient Egypt experienced what
they referred to as a golden
age.
If the Cayce
readings about the existence of
Atlantis are true, then might
the Sphinx actually be a remnant
from this advanced civilization?
Perhaps further clues to this
connection can be found with yet
another Cayce prophecy regarding
the Sphinx.
Cayce dreamed that
under the right paw of the
Sphinx there was a chamber at a
very specific place, that
apparently hold the hall of
records from the lost
civilization of Atlantis, which
Cayce felt he was a direct part
of.
When Atlantis was
sinking, the Atlanteans were
aware of the importance of
saving these records.
And they also were aware of the
need to hide the records of
prehistory.
If we locate the
original hall of records, we
would be essentially accessing
the equivalent of a Google
search engine, but it's the
Atlantean Internet.
So the Sphinx is an entry point
that could reveal once and for
all that humankind is much
older on Earth than we thought.
The Giza Plateau.
1978.
45 years after Cayce's reading,
The Edgar Cayce Foundation
initiates the Sphinx Exploration
Project for the sole purpose of
locating secret chambers under
the Sphinx that may lead to the
hall of records.
They were allowed,
amazingly, to drill holes under
the Sphinx to detect this
possible chamber.
They drilled eight holes.
Unfortunately, nothing of
certainty was found.
They were stopped at the last
minute-apparently they were
very close, they felt-by the
Egyptian army.
We did find
anomalies beneath the Sphinx.
Now, these could be chambers,
not just cracks or caves.
Edgar Cayce prophesied that in
the future, and in the
relatively near future, we
would discover the secret
chamber of the hall of records.
One of the stories
of the Sphinx is that there's a
hall of records that's being
kept there.
Uh, certain machines and
technology and libraries sealed
in a special room until the time
is right that we're ready to
discover it.
And that time may be coming
soon.
Is it possible that
there are, in fact, secret
chambers underneath the Sphinx?
And if so, could they be hiding
the hidden records of a lost
civilization?
Or could it be that if a
so-called hall of records
exists, it doesn't lie in Giza,
but millions of miles away... on Mars?
Pasadena, California.
July 4, 1997.
Aerospace engineers at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory anxiously
await a signal from the
Pathfinder indicating that it
has landed intact on the surface
of Mars.
Thousands of viewers watch live
news feeds as the event unfolds.
The spacecraft has landed.
Base pedal down.
Hours after its
successful landing, Pathfinder
sends the first images from the
surface of Mars in over two
decades.
During its 12-week mission, Mars
Pathfinder transmits 2.3 billion
bits of information, including
more than 17,000 images.
Among these photos is an image
that some say reveals formations
that mirror the Giza Plateau...
...including what appears to be
a sphinx.
One of these
photographs shows what looks
like a sphinx that is facing to
the east, uh, sunrise on Mars.
There is a huge pyramid mountain
behind it and you have to wonder
if this Martian sphinx isn't
created by extraterrestrials.
Some have proposed
that there is a mirror image of
the Giza Plateau on Mars and
therefore Mars might have been
inhabited.
And this is why we allegedly
have structures on Mars that are
of artificial origin.
The idea of
extraterrestrial life inhabiting
Mars has long fascinated
mankind.
In 1895, astronomer Percival
Lowell proposed an ancient
civilization built canals on
Mars to bring water from the
poles to keep their society
alive.
And since the first landing on
the surface of Mars in 1976,
NASA Mars missions have focused
almost exclusively on
determining if life could exist
on the red planet.
We've found no
real hard evidence of life.
And yet there's this tantalizing
possibility where we haven't
given up.
We would be looking for a
subterranean civilization,
because surface conditions are
just so harsh.
Conceivably, you could have
whole complex ecosystems
existing underground.
I think that if we
were to go to Mars and find
civilization there, much of it
would be underground.
And you have to wonder if this
Martian sphinx isn't guarding
some underground world on Mars
similar to the underground world
at Giza that we know exists
today.
Do the formations
on Mars provide evidence that
the planet was once inhabited?
And if so, does this sphinx on
Mars also serve as a marker of
an entrance to an underground
world and perhaps the true
location of a secret hall of
records?
According to some ancient
astronaut theorists, if this
sphinx in Giza truly has a
counterpart on Mars, it would
match up with what has been
found in some of mankind's
earliest writings.
A famous
linguist by the name of Zecharia
Sitchin actually translated
ancient Sumerian tablets that
describe Mars being used as a
way station by their gods, the
Anunnaki.
It's very possible that these
ancient Sumerian tales talking
about the Anunnaki traversing
between Mars and Earth are
actual fact and show a deeper
connection of what we have in
Giza and what we also have on
Mars.
Every scientist
agrees today that Mars at some
point in time in the past had an
atmosphere not very unlike
Earth's.
And so if one were to propose
the idea that at some point
intelligent life inhabited Mars,
what if one of the places that
they escaped to was planet
Earth?
Is it possible that
there is, in fact, a profound
connection between Earth and
Mars?
And could locating a second
sphinx be the key to unlocking
the secrets about our ancient
past?
And if so, is it possible that
there is yet another sphinx that holds
the key, one that's even closer to home?
Giza, 2014.
Large-scale construction
projects and high-rise
development encroach ever closer
to the Sphinx and the Great
Pyramids.
Some believe that if the
development continues unchecked,
it will lead to the destruction
of possible archaeological
treasures still buried near the
complex.
But others feel that it may
actually force the unearthing of
something more profound, a twin
sphinx.
Everything in ancient
Egyptian art is very
symmetrical.
There's always two of
everything.
When we see huge, big statues,
there's always two colossal
statues.
There's always symmetry: two
statues guarding one road.
With the Sphinx, we've only
found one.
Some people believe there's
another one.
There are actually
many reasons to believe it may
have had a mate.
When we look at the stele, the
New Kingdom stele between the
paws of the Sphinx, in fact it
shows not one sphinx but two
sphinxes.
There were long
periods of time where the Sphinx
was not seen.
It was completely covered in
sand.
And so the idea would imply that
maybe there are other structures
that are still underneath the
sand.
Is it possible that a second
sphinx exists on the Giza
Plateau?
Although most
researchers are open to the idea
of a second guardian on the Giza
Plateau, multiple theories exist
as to where this sphinx may be.
According to the Amduat, the
ancient Egyptian funerary text
describing the hourly journey of
the king in the afterlife, there
is said to exist a second sphinx
that faces to the west.
The fifth hour--
which seems to represent the
Giza Necropolis, by the way-is
protected by one sphinx in the
east, which is the existing
sphinx, but they also show
another sphinx in the back.
Now, physically was there
another one?
It's quite possible.
There is certain mounds that
haven't been properly excavated
on the west side, and there may
be the remains of a sphinx.
There certainly isn't a whole
sphinx-we would've seen it by
now-but there may be the
foundations of a sphinx.
The nonexistent sphinx
is almost as interesting as the
one we can look at.
Does that location have any
special energy to it?
Is there some reason why life,
fate, the gods would have it
disappear?
Could there really
be a second sphinx located
somewhere on the Giza Plateau?
And if so, how has it remained
undiscovered for thousands of
years?
We know less than 30%
of what's actually underneath
the sand, especially around the
Giza Plateau.
So this is one of the exciting
things about studying and
researching ancient Egypt is
this idea that maybe you'll be
able to stumble into these
ultimate secrets that the
ancients assured us are there.
Would locating a
second sphinx bring us closer to
actually solving the mystery of
the Giza Plateau?
And if so, what might the
consequences be if this
information is ever uncovered?
If we put all the
pieces together, it suggests
that the Sphinx is a repository
for this knowledge about how to
actually use the Great Pyramid.
And once we do that, we're
talking about the ability to
resurrect ourselves as celestial
beings, or star beings, and join
the extraterrestrials who had a
hand in building this incredible
complex.
I very much believe
that the whole thing is a kind
of cipher.
And I'll-I'll go to my grave on
this one.
I've worked for 25 years to
decipher this cipher using
astronomy, using the texts.
And it reads, "I have under me
the knowledge of our genesis."
Whatever it is we
figure out, whatever we discover
when we get there, it's not
gonna look like we thought it
would look.
Is the Sphinx the
ultimate proof that
extraterrestrials were here on
Earth in the ancient past?
And if so, might there be clues
hidden within this monolithic
statue that not only reveal the
truth about our history but why
we are here and how we can
finally reconnect with our alien
ancestors?
09x07 - Alien Messages
Watch/Buy Amazon Merchandise
Explores the pseudoscientific hypothesis of ancient astronauts in a non-critical, documentary format.
Explores the pseudoscientific hypothesis of ancient astronauts in a non-critical, documentary format.